Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
D Vanditmars
User Rank
Author
FM
D Vanditmars   12/5/2013 4:29:57 PM
NO RATINGS
And I have though all along that FM stood for Funny Magic, (we at least in Silicon Valley).

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: IoT ?
Max The Magnificent   12/4/2013 10:49:22 AM
NO RATINGS
@Victor: ...think about how happy will others be after breaking into what you believed to be "secure"...

Good point -- so long as we are increasing the sum total of human happiness LOL

Victor Lorenzo
User Rank
Author
Re: IoT ?
Victor Lorenzo   12/4/2013 10:42:59 AM
NO RATINGS
@Max, "I agree -- but I'm sad we have to worry about stuff like that (sad face)".

Well, thinking about making a system "secure" has also a lot of fun... and is of course challenging.

...and think about how happy will others be after breaking into what you believed to be "secure"... LOL. Of course they will also have a lot of fun succeding on that, trust me. ;)

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: IoT ?
Max The Magnificent   12/4/2013 10:20:02 AM
NO RATINGS
@Victor: As security is a concern in the IoT, crypto accelerators will most likely be a 'basic' feature/requirement for MCUs/SoCs targeted at IoT applications.

I agree -- but I'm sad we have to worry about stuff like that (sad face)

Blunk
User Rank
Author
FM = Fujitsu MCU
Blunk   12/4/2013 2:47:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps they were speaking slowly because they were thinking on their feet for a new acceptable meaning to FM.

Victor Lorenzo
User Rank
Author
Re: IoT ?
Victor Lorenzo   12/4/2013 1:51:14 AM
NO RATINGS
@Max: "The C0+ based MCUs are more applicable to a wide range of IoT applications". The concept of IoT is not limited to sensors all around wirelessly connected to a local network, it seems like it goes far beyond that limit.

I think we could expect even newer architectures with more processing power-per-mW and more power efficient communications interface technologies showing up soon.

As security is a concern in the IoT, crypto accelerators will most likely be a 'basic' feature/requirement for MCUs/SoCs targeted at IoT applications.

Victor Lorenzo
User Rank
Author
Re: Background of this announcement
Victor Lorenzo   12/4/2013 1:35:20 AM
NO RATINGS
@Stevens: "I am very interesting in bindng IoT and Engergy Harvesting". Perhaps we wouldn't have to wait too long for that as some power management chips targetted at energy harvesting as well as some ultra low porwer MCUs are readily available.

The ZigBee Alliance will also contribute to IoT with the ZigBee PRO Green Power introduced at the end of 2012 (http://www.zigbee.org/Specifications/ZigBee/GreenPower.aspx).

Victor Lorenzo
User Rank
Author
Re: flexible
Victor Lorenzo   12/4/2013 1:26:45 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree with @krisi "I would think every microcontroller is flexible by definition" and if you let me I would like to add one small detail... if it's running from FLASH/EEPROM and not from ROM masked at the factory or bricked with a static program code it is even more flexible.

Stevens.Wang
User Rank
Author
Re: Background of this announcement
Stevens.Wang   12/3/2013 10:37:55 PM
NO RATINGS
I am very interesting in bindng IoT and Engergy Harvesting ...

It's an art of balancing, I think ^ ^. 

alex_m1
User Rank
Author
Re: flexible
alex_m1   12/3/2013 4:00:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Krisi, They mean flexilbility at their factory , when they limit the capabilities of each unit and then sell it under a different number.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...