Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 6   >   >>
Wnderer
User Rank
Author
Drones and autonomous vehicles
Wnderer   12/6/2013 9:08:15 AM
NO RATINGS
The way to use the drones is to couple them with Google's autonomous vehicles. The self-driving vehicle drives up to your house and a drone delivers the package to your front door. It then calls your phone and tells you the package is there.

jg30
User Rank
Author
Squeeze Play
jg30   12/6/2013 8:16:35 AM
NO RATINGS
I think it's obvious that Bezos is putting UPS and Fedex on notice.  Keep your pricing lower than it costs me to build millions of tiny helicopters!!  Effective whether or not it actually gets implemented.  At the same time he builds so much loyalty with those of us in love with technological advances.  Quite brilliant and bold as usual.  

rtapl123
User Rank
Author
Re: Think Big
rtapl123   12/5/2013 10:08:35 PM
NO RATINGS
No - there are LOTS more problems with this.  Air turbulence is just one.  Dog, animals, small children, bicycles - the list goes on and on.

rtapl123
User Rank
Author
Re: Emergency Medical Supplies
rtapl123   12/5/2013 10:06:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for writing a sensible piece on this idotic idea.  If you have ever flown model aircraft or helicopters you will realize this is complete nonsense.  Air currents near the ground and buildings are horrendous and include lots of rotors that will just dump the vehicle.

 

Bezos clearly is no expert on fluid dynamics or vehicle flight.

damngoodengineer
User Rank
Author
Speaking of Hot Air
damngoodengineer   12/5/2013 9:10:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Why not we install a national pneumatic delivery system?

Large tubes deliver goods between regions, smaller diameter tubes handle point to point.

This would be cool.  Also probably would be sabotaged by high school kids with stink bombs or worse.  Too bad - order a burger and fries (or beer) and zoom there it is. 

 

Terry.Bollinger
User Rank
Author
A bit of privacy context
Terry.Bollinger   12/5/2013 10:08:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Privacy! Flying cameras! Governments! Bezoses! Omygoshes!!

First, everyone, please: Don't ever assume that privacy will take care of itself. It won't. It is a right that everyone must pay attention to and treat carefully, and it's a big part of what real democracy is all about.

Privacy will also require some innovative thinking as we get more and more connected, since in many cases the real issue is not how much information is available, but who gets access to it. If only a few have access, you and your society are in trouble, since such highly concentrated power will inevitably be subject to human foibles -- and most humans really, really like power.
 
The James Madison et al concept of balance of power and cross checks very much comes to mind here, but it will likely need to be broadened in new ways. Physicist and science fiction author David Brin advocates a sort of open-source privacy model in which everyone has equal access to public information. It's a pretty unsettling thought, though arguably not that different from what many people are already doing with Facebook. It's also a lot less scarier than the idea of some very small number of people getting exclusive access to everything. Open privacy in contrast lets everyone be part of the free press -- and that in turn makes it a lot harder for some small number of folks to do really stupid or greedy things without getting caught.
 
With all of that said, blaming drone cameras as somehow magically putting us over some critical horizon of loss of privacy is, to the say the least, a strangely myopic view of the problem. For example, what other IT capabilities should be banned based on worries about what you could do with them?
 
Well, the entire Internet of course. Cars too, because they can carry cameras, look at Russia! Of course people can carry small cameras too, so I guess you have to ban all small cameras... so no more smart phones, stop that right now! No bank cameras of course, you know how this stuff creeps in starting with what sounds like a reasonable exception... Facebook? Ohmigosh, I guess you would just sort of have to arrest everyone there, at a minimum? And LinkedIn too? And Twitter? And any social medium? I mean, these nefarious folks are seducing the entire population of the world into giving away all their secrets and enjoy doing it! It's almost like one of those, what do they call them, free-market economies where everyone trusts each other enough to advertise who they are and what they can do freely, so that everyone can make new innovative connections and build new forms of trust.
 
Less cynically: Ludditing does not enhance privacy. Bezos is trying hard to show how drones can do useful things, and I applaud him for it. By doing so, he will eventually help address the very privacy concerns that folks are worried about. Why? Because he's showing how positive, free-market style options for sometimes scary new ideas can benefit everyone in positive, growth-generating ways. That in turn will produce the political will to ban the truly negative uses of the same technologies, something that's hard to do when people can't see the full spectrum of possible uses.


Larry0
User Rank
Author
Flight time
Larry0   12/4/2013 12:14:02 AM
NO RATINGS
Flight time is about 10 minutes and the radio range on a fully charged battery is about 1/2 mile or so. Now you add some weigh like a small package and flight time is really short. What sized box will it lift? It would take less time and money to just deliver the package the old fashioned way. 

_hm
User Rank
Author
Re: Overkill and unnecessary
_hm   12/3/2013 7:08:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Drone looks good potential in remote community. But Amazon may not be really interested in this good work.

 

CTHP
User Rank
Author
Re: It's just marketing!
CTHP   12/3/2013 6:30:34 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree. The legal ramifications and theft will be too much to support such an idea. And with a 10 mile radius, why not just jump into your car and drive to the Amazon 'will call' window and simply pick up your purchase.

Paul.Chow
User Rank
Author
It's just marketing!
Paul.Chow   12/3/2013 5:44:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Only engineers would get into a discussion about the feasibility of this :-)  How much free advertising did Amazon just get by being in the news on the busiest days of shopping?

BTW, I heard this on CBC radio this morning, so I'm not taking credit, but given the timing, you have to think this is a very elaborate piece of marketing.

Meanwhile, back to the feasibility discussion!!  I think we need to add cloaking http://media.utoronto.ca/media-releases/thin-active-invisibility-cloak-demonstrated-for-first-time/ and you make the package appear when you are ready to pick it up!  Sorry, just wanted to push some local technology :-)

 

<<   <   Page 2 / 6   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...