I don't see immediate application for IP over BT4.1. Sure it is a "good to have" feature, but they have to make success on BT4.0 GATT model first. Ever since BT4.0 spec was released on 2010, it is sayd "This year BTLE will breakout" almost every year, but I still don't see clear trend from Legacy profile-based BT2.1 to GATT-based BT4.0.
security features has been improved in BT since rev 2.1, however, still not fully adopted for medical applications (e,.g: Body Sensor) to my knowledge, instead other standards such as 802.15.6 is being sought.
personally, I think with current low power support in BT (1mW) and a more robust security implementation , BT can easily become a choice, mainly becuse it is using a shared spectrum.
It's great to see the new improvements in BT in terms of power consumption and RF, I am wondering if BT ever going to implement a more secure and solid connection to become attarctive for other applications such as medical and Industrial?
Backward compatibility and usability for app-cessories such as wearables are both very important aspects of this update that remain sort of in question. Still, the fact that this update allows for maintenance of connections with less frequent manual intervention is a major boon, as that has often been an issue with Bluetooth connectivity. Expanded time intervals should also benefit the user experience.
It seems many devices are going with wifi - range being the largest issue although being able to work with existing networks, and the internet another. You would need to have repeaters in a house unless the range was boosted, and as mentioned before backward compatibility with existing networks? I can see in cars and such, but how in a house, and between "things" will it work?
All new Bluetooth versions are designed to be reverse compatable with previous versions of the specification and v4.1 is no different.
The only caveat is Bluetooth Smart products that impelement the "Low Energy" feture introduced in the v4.0 specification. Bluetooth Smart products (such as the latest generation of fitness monitors and other wearables) are compatible with other products labled Bluetooth Smart or Bluetooth Smart Ready.
Rich: My understanding is that, by its very nature of being "low energy" it cannot be backward compatible with 'classic' BT. However, I believe both modes could co-exist in say a dual-mode phone. And they probably should because they have different purposes. What is happening here is that BT LE is going after a market that has been dominated by other low power wireless protocols, such as ANT+.
Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.