Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
rick merritt
User Rank
Re: They can't get much worse...
rick merritt   12/6/2013 12:43:33 PM
Good feedback, Penguin.

The theory is Msoft has the UI expertise and Nokia is  better in hw and industrial design, but I wonder what the pratcie really is when the EEs meet eyeball to eyeball?

User Rank
They can't get much worse...
sa_penguin   12/5/2013 9:30:56 PM
My wife has an old Nokia 6500 slide, it's brilliant. From power up to getting a carrier in under 10 seconds. Alas, if only Nokia had stayed at that level...

I recently bought the Asha 300: biggest mistake of my life. The old button controls have been replaced by a touch screen - with the most jarring errors I've seen. I have yet to master the dark art of scrolling down the screen [to select an option] so I haven't even set the time zone. It sits untouched in a box, to be a gift for someone I dislike.

If Nokia design [engineers or whoever] have been ignoring the user interface experience for the last few years, are they really going to be any worse under Microsoft?

rick merritt
User Rank
Re: Nokia feedabck
rick merritt   12/5/2013 8:25:48 PM
Yes, I'd love to hear feedback from an Nokia EEs!

User Rank
Nokia feedabck
_hm   12/5/2013 5:52:19 PM
How does Nokia designer feels working for Microsoft management? It will be nice if Nokia engineer share this experience.


User Rank
But will it make money?
DMcCunney   12/5/2013 1:10:47 PM
I can certainly understand why MS should buy Nokia's phone/tablet business.  The traditional PC market that constitutes MS's core business is flat or shrinking.  Growth is in smartphones and tablets, and MS's success in that area has been negligable.

If you are an established vendor in a market and you want to get into a related one where you don't have a presense, you have two choices: create a new unit to address that market, or buy someone who is already established in it.  Nokia fits the latter qualification.

The problem is that while Nokia has significant market share in smartphones, the share is largely in the low end commodity segment of the market, with competition on price and paper thin margins.  MS also faces the ongoing challenge of making Windows8/Windows Phone accepted in the tablet/smartphone markets, where iOS and Android have commanding leads. 

I have also seen suggestions that Elop has the inside track on being the next MS CEO when Ballmer steps down.

One question may be "Did Elop make the right call in choosing Windows Phone to replace Symbian, or should Nokia have gone to a Linux based solution like Android?"

Another question will be MS's understanding of and ability to compete in the smartphone market.  MS already sells hardware - keyboards and mice, and the Xbox gaming console - but this will be a new level of involvement in a new market segment.

MS's best days were when Bill Gates was CEO and Steve Ballmer was COO.  Gates had the strategic vision, and Ballmer managed day-to-day execution of Bill's overall plans.  When Gates stepped aside and Ballmer became CEO, the question was whether he also had strategic vision, and the apparent answer was that he didn't.  MS under Ballmer has mostly been "more of the same" when new initiatives were arguably needed.

Elop obviously has strategic vision,  What's not clear is whether it's correct.

We'll see.



User Rank
selinz   12/5/2013 11:56:11 AM
if google can buy Motorola, Microsoft should be able to buy nokia

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
past experience
zewde yeraswork   12/5/2013 9:39:58 AM
When exactly in the past has Microsoft crushed a company's culture by not keeping "the kid gloves on." It's worth looking at those experiences closely as Nokia definitely has its own identity--although whether they will maintain that identity separate from Microsoft, whether they will even keep the name, is also in doubt.

As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...