Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Aeroengineer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Problems with board revision
Aeroengineer   1/18/2014 2:02:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the update!  I saw on their website that they have a beta release coming out that adds STEP/IGES functionality.  I am sure that it has a few other things.  I will take a look at it and see what comes of it.

 

I have also been playing with DesignSpark PCB.  They too have a new version coming out that I will need to check out.

elizabethsimon
User Rank
CEO
Problems with board revision
elizabethsimon   1/15/2014 2:47:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Just thought I'd give an update on my DipTrace experience now that I'm modifying the design that I previously did. I ran into the following problems in doing the update.

"sticky" net names when disconnecting and connecting "netports"

no options given (and NO warning) when merging nets.

 

For this change I had to create an isolated ground so I wanted some of the pins on the GND net to connect to the new ISOGND net. I disconnected the GND "netport" and connected up the new ISOGND "nteport" to find that the pins were still connected to GND. I finally had to delete the GND nets from the pins I wanted to change over and create new connections to ISOGND. In my opinion this was more of a pain than it needed to be.

The other thing that happened is that I removed a diode and connected the two nets. DipTrace didn't give me a choice as to what the new net name would be or any warning that I was connecting two named nets.

Both of these problems resulted in a net having a different name from the attached "netport" . I also rediscovered that you have to manually name the net even after you attach the "netport"...

Also, the trace editing capibility is not as good as I'd like. But then I'm used to a higher-end system...

I'm interested in finding out more about the other free/low-cost options.

 

 

elizabethsimon
User Rank
CEO
Re: Very useful
elizabethsimon   12/11/2013 1:08:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, they're upgrade plans are quite reasonable and I like that you can just pay the price difference to go to the next level. Also, you can use the free version as a viewer for designs that exceed the pin limitations. This was useful on a recent project where I needed to get feedback from someone off site. I could just email him the files and he could measure clearances and check part positions.

 

Aeroengineer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Very useful -- a bit on libraries
Aeroengineer   12/11/2013 11:20:44 AM
NO RATINGS
I love SolidWorks.  I usually though would just model the part up in SW as well and save it out to the DipTrace file format that they like.  It is a useless file format, but people seem to like it because it is trendy on the web.  STEP214 would be a much better choice as it is supported across almost all MCAD programs.  STEP is harder to impliment as it supports much higher levels of complexity, but to me if you are going to charge almost $1000 for the paid version, at least that version should support this standard 3D file format.

Aeroengineer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Very useful
Aeroengineer   12/11/2013 11:16:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Elizabeth,

 

I consider any program that I can get a sucessful result without having to read a bunch of manuals or watch a few youtube videos an intuitive program, though, I should probably throw out that I am the type of person that is willing to push a button just to see what it does.  So I usually spend some time "breaking" in a new program.  If it does not break, then it was successful ;)

 

The pin limitations could be a bigger problem for some people.  The nice thing is that their upgrade plans are not too expensive.

TonyTib
User Rank
CEO
Re: Very useful -- a bit on libraries
TonyTib   12/10/2013 12:33:45 PM
NO RATINGS
IIRC, Sparkfun had a comment about PCB libraries: they always make their own, because they had been burned more than once by parts created by someone else that had wrong footprints.

Also, different people prefer different styles for the schematic part of the part.


One plus of my 3D approach at work (I design the PCB, our ME models it in SolidWorks using STEP/IGES models from the mfg -- note most components are connectors which have mfg models) is that it provides an independent check on my footprints.

elizabethsimon
User Rank
CEO
Re: Very useful
elizabethsimon   12/10/2013 11:56:38 AM
NO RATINGS
I've been using DipTrace for a few months.  I've upgraded to their "Standard" version because I quickly ran into the pin limitations of the free version. I'm not sure that I completly agree with you about the intuitiveness of the interface but that may be because I'm migrating from another program with a different UI and I have to use an enterprise level program at work with yet a third UI. I do like the forums and have found answers to all my questions in there.

By the way, I've tried to import from PADS but the problem I have is that the version of PADS I have is so old that DipTrace doesn't recognize the libraries. I was able to import a very simple file that used standard library parts though...

 

Aeroengineer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: PCB Elegance
Aeroengineer   12/9/2013 4:56:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the update, I will take a look.

antennahead
User Rank
Rookie
Re: PCB Elegance
antennahead   12/9/2013 12:29:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Sorry for the delayed follow up.

The author of PCB Elegance is Herman Morsink.  He lives in the Netherlands.  He developed PCB Elegance for about 12 years, and apparently decided to move on to something else.

Previously, his web site was merco.nl, and pcbelegance.com.

Before shutting down those sites, he annouced release of the source code, and also removed the constraints on the full version, thereby making it freeware.

The full/free version can be found at:

http://www.softpedia.com/get/Science-CAD/PCB-Elegance.shtml

there are still many links on the internet for the trial version- make sure you get the full version.

PCB Elegance has some really handy features like a nice SMT geometry wizard, and import/export of DXF and bitmap images.

It is very light weight (only 10 MB download) and runs pretty fast.  My biggest complaint about it is that the area fill tool isn't great (it works though).

So, I don't see that Mr. Morsink put the code anywhere else besides his own site, but at least the program is available.

Aeroengineer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Very useful
Aeroengineer   12/7/2013 2:11:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Zeeglen,

 

You are correct about why I have KiCAD in the runner up section.  THough, it is something that I am following closely.  I have been seeing signs that there is a major update in the works.  With some of the things that they are looking to do, it could easily put it ahead of the feature offerings of the other systems.

 

Also thanks for taking the time to read and think about the articles.  It is really appreciated.  If there is something that you feel that I have missed, please let me know and I will go back and take a closer look.

 

Adam

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
14 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).