Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
DrFPGA
User Rank
Author
Re: Difference in Technology
DrFPGA   12/12/2013 3:04:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanx-

here is one I found...

http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1280939 

 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Difference in Technology
junko.yoshida   12/12/2013 2:21:38 PM
NO RATINGS
DrFPGA, I am looking into it. Stay tuned.

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: Strong IP?
zewde yeraswork   12/12/2013 9:20:52 AM
NO RATINGS
Of course, time isn't the only limiting factor here. It's more likely that bieing big enough as a company to pursue lawsuits while continuing to innovate on the side is what determines whether a company in fact chooses to do what it must to protect its IP. It's a luxury many companies don't have.

betajet
User Rank
Author
Re: Strong IP?
betajet   12/11/2013 7:35:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Junko Yoshida said: ...in the end, companies have to do everything in their power to protect their IPs. No questions about it.

Actually, I believe there is a question and a trade-off.  When a company becomes a patent aggressor, it's often the case that the company has ceased to be a technological leader and must instead live off its existing patents and what it has purchased from others when the company had a lot of cash.  Companies with great new ideas and great products are too busy developing those ideas and products to waste time preparing lawsuits.  At least that's the impression I get, and I'm sure I'm not alone.

A public company has an obligation to its shareholders to maximize the company's value.  If suing over dubious patents besmirches a company's reputation and makes it look like it's on its way down, that's not maximizing shareholder value.

JMO/YMMV/IANAL

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: Patent battles distract resources away from activities that provide real value.
zewde yeraswork   12/11/2013 1:05:55 PM
NO RATINGS
It does seem as though the legal battles amount to a lot of nothing--except for employment and billing hours for lawyers and others, and more headaches and confusions for end users.

DrFPGA
User Rank
Author
Difference in Technology
DrFPGA   12/11/2013 12:22:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Anyone know what the difference (if any) is for these two? It would be great to get a quick summary from someone 'in the know'. Maybe there are already articles on the EE Times site that discuss this?

superopamp
User Rank
Author
Patent battles distract resources away from activities that provide real value.
superopamp   12/11/2013 11:49:42 AM
NO RATINGS
The patent protection system is overdue for an overhaul. There are few truly unique innovations that deserve patent protection. Most are solutions that any competent engineer or scientist would come up with when faced with a specific problem. The current system results in a lot of work by accountants and lawyers that provides no real benefit to society.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Potential IP battle brewing...
junko.yoshida   12/10/2013 4:05:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Based on all the quesitons I received from our readers on my previous story (http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1320210), I did a follow-up interview with Spansion.

Here's that story.

The conversation with Spansion executive clarified who will be manufacturing embedded MCUs with eCT at which node. (UMC @40-nm).

But more interesting was the potential IP battle brewing  on Renesas embedded Flash vs. Spansion's eCT, as indicated by Spansion's executive.

We will know more when Renesas gets back to us.

 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Strong IP?
junko.yoshida   12/10/2013 3:59:09 PM
NO RATINGS
@EFosters, as to the strength of Spansion's IPs, obviously, I think that's something for our legal system to decide. While I do understand that people are weary of all the news about IP battles, in the end, companies have to do everything in their power to protect their IPs. No questions about it. 

We will see how far Spansion will take this (especially on eCT front).

 

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
contention
zewde yeraswork   12/10/2013 3:52:58 PM
NO RATINGS
whether these two companies are incidentally treading over the same territory or not, it sounds like they're pretty serious about their IPs and ready to battle over them

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
David Ashton
 
resistion
 
resistion
 
Bill_Jaffa
 
David Ashton
 
David Ashton
 
Aries1470
 
realjjj
 
junko.yoshida
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Protecting sensitive electronic circuitry from voltage ...
09:45
Watch as a web server authenticates or rejects a water ...
Protecting sensitive electronic circuitry from voltage ...
Watch as a web server authenticates or rejects a water ...
Protecting sensitive electronic circuitry from voltage ...
Power can be a gating factor in success or failure of ...
Get to market faster and connect your next product to the ...
00:44
See how microQSFP is setting a new standard for tomorrow’s ...
The LTC3649 step-down regulator combines key features of a ...
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27