Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
KB3001
User Rank
Author
Re: Self-driving cars in 2020
KB3001   12/21/2013 8:31:46 AM
NO RATINGS
Who needs TV in the first instance? LOL

KB3001
User Rank
Author
Re: Self-driving cars in 2020
KB3001   12/21/2013 8:30:35 AM
NO RATINGS
True but that is not to say it is going nowhere forever. I believe it will be common place in the mid to long term simply because it is a more natural way of perceiving scenes.

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: Self-driving cars in 2020
Max The Magnificent   12/20/2013 11:02:55 AM
@Junko: ...you do need to accept the fact that it is really going NOWHERE at this point.

I accept nothing of the sort. I prefer to live in a fool's paradise. I agree with Dire Straits who sang "I want my 3D TV" (or words to that effect :-)

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Self-driving cars in 2020
junko.yoshida   12/20/2013 7:36:24 AM
NO RATINGS
@max, Seriously? When it comes to 3D, you do need to accept the fact that it is really going NOWHERE at this point. Even Hollywood is scaling back 3D film production, and there is no TV programs (including sports) in sight offering 3D coverage!

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: Self-driving cars in 2020
Max The Magnificent   12/18/2013 3:41:39 PM
NO RATINGS
@Zewde: 3DTV is entirely unnecessary. It is a luxury...

They said that about color TV ... then HD TV (they also said it about adding sound to movies in the 1920s LOL)

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: autopilot comparisons
junko.yoshida   12/18/2013 11:28:46 AM
NO RATINGS
If I may add one more thing. As to what you just described as the challenges autonomous cars facing, it is true -- and that's why we also need to build up Car to Car and Car to Infrastructure.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: autopilot comparisons
junko.yoshida   12/18/2013 11:27:11 AM
NO RATINGS
@prabhakar, I agree. Hence the difficulty of pulling off self-driving cars. There are so many unseen factors on the road today, when compared to the controlled airspace. But the analogy does apply in a sense that both self-driving cars are marching toward "auto pilot."

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: Self-driving cars in 2020
zewde yeraswork   12/18/2013 9:25:19 AM
NO RATINGS
3DTV is entirely unnecessary. It is a luxury, a matter of entertainment purely. Self-driving cars could really be a boon for those with handicaps and other issues who have difficulty operating a car. The hurdles not withstanding, it is a vision that seems worth pursuing--the timeframe the automobile industry is offering may be a bit ambitious, granted.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
We are nearly there already!
KB3001   12/18/2013 2:54:32 AM
NO RATINGS
The technology we have today allows for this, guys. Driving on the wide highways of the US for example does not need much human intervention, I often find myself bored driving over there :) some degree of autonomy would avoid accident I would venture. The issues that are delaying this are mostly legal IMHO (Think aboutInsurance for example).

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
Author
Re: autopilot comparisons
prabhakar_deosthali   12/18/2013 2:26:14 AM
I think , comparing the planes flying in auto pilot mode with the autonomous  cars is incorrect.

When the planes go into cruise mode, they are assigned a specific height to fly by the control tower and the control tower makes sure that no other plane is assigned the same height in that time slot.  So this is like a road kept empty for a single car to pass thorough. Such kind of provision is not possible for vehicles on the road , there will be thousands of vehicles plying on the same road at different speeds in different lanes with hundreds of intersections .

 

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
andybe
 
Bruzzer
 
Bruzzer
 
CB_EE
 
uv-linkedin
 
CB_EE
 
CB_EE
 
uv-linkedin
 
CB_EE
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...