Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Modulation marches forward
rick merritt   12/24/2013 11:29:43 AM
NO RATINGS
@elsissi: I invite you to do the Google patent search on the name of the CTO Amir Eliaz yourself and you will see 14 issued patents.

As for unsupported superlatives: I invite you to puncture holes in anything you see in the story or the patents. But please be specific.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Modulation marches forward
rick merritt   12/24/2013 11:33:04 AM
NO RATINGS
@sridhar: I believe they were suggesting 10dB could be translated into higher data rates, lower power consumption or longer distances, not all three at once.

dt_hayden
User Rank
CEO
Re: Modulation marches forward
dt_hayden   12/24/2013 11:48:17 AM
Elsissi - See the list of 15 published patents I posted already.  I have not had time to review them much, I am starting with 8,526,523.

One thing that does stand out is the new transmission method uses a metric of 10^-1 to 10^-3 symbol error rate which seems in stark contrast to the 10^-6 metric normally applied to BER for data transmissions.

It is also astounding to me that these patent applications could be filed in Jan 2013 and granted in Sept 2013, for what is claimed to be a revolutionary technology.  There is a lot to take in for anyone, patent examiners included.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Re: Modulation marches forward
Bert22306   12/26/2013 5:46:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Uuuh, more like truth gets stretched.

If existing modulation and error correction schemes get well withing 3 dB of the Shannon limit, it makes no sense to annonce that some new scheme is 10 dB better!

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Re: Modulation marches forward
Bert22306   12/26/2013 6:06:48 PM
NO RATINGS
"I believe they were suggesting 10dB could be translated into higher data rates, lower power consumption or longer distances, not all three at once."

Well, perhaps the "power consumption" angle adds enough ambiguity to let this otherwise unsupportable claim slide. Perhaps. I'd have to do a survey to tell for sure. As to distance (SNR actually, combined with receiver noise), data rate, and channel bandwidth, that *is* the tradeoff made by Shannon's equation. Either all thee together, or fix two and vary only one, or fix one and vary only two, makes no difference. That's why the claim sounds wrong.

This sort of truth bending happens all the time. In an interview I heard on a supposedly revolutionary engine design, the interviewee implied that his engine's efficiency was way higher than the norm because it had a lot more "working area" than standard piston engines.

Too bad the interviewer didn't think to ask, "What does working area have to do with efficiency? It's all about compression ratio. Tell me your engine has higher compression ratio, and I might start to believe. And then I'll ask, how do you prevent detonation?" The problem is just accepting as fact the implied significance of some irrelevant measurement.

These claims of supposed "breakthroughs" are very rarely credible.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Re: Modulation marches forward
Bert22306   12/26/2013 6:12:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Good point on the more lenient BER criterion. That's enough to make comparisons invalid. Still, the BER does tend to drop rather quickly at the limit. So it may not make a huge difference.

Macroblocker
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Modulation marches forward
Macroblocker   12/28/2013 8:11:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Does this company check out?  Is it based in the USA or Israel?

It looks like it's owned by Yossi Cohen and Amir Eliaz.

A possible address for the company came up as a residential address on Upper Vintage Rd in Laguna Niguel, California, 92677.




<<   <   Page 3 / 3


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).