Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
MS243
User Rank
Author
Re: What about?
MS243   12/28/2013 6:11:14 AM
NO RATINGS
Need fast -- X or A or Achr.

Need live at boot M or L or X(cpld)

Need reliable (M -- low soft error rate) often combined with other brands to reduce tool errors

(Need disimilar -- any of the three -- see above)

Need a  certain package --

...

 

All good reasons for disimilar parts

 

 

KarlS01
User Rank
Author
Re: ARM and OpenCL = portability?
KarlS01   12/20/2013 10:45:46 AM
NO RATINGS
Hi, Brian:  So far about a year has passed, several bloggers have ZED boards, and the biggest deal has been that Adam Taylor has an OS running on one core and bare metal on the other.

Xilinx changed Vivado and has a new architecture for the latest device that seems to emphasize HLS rather than ARM SoC.  (haven't heard much about Altera)

Sure makes me wonder about the popularity/success of ARM on FPGA.

OpenCL is just a generalization of the Graphics PU concept rather than a general system solution to the memory wall/ von Neumann bottleneck.

Just as in most designs most paths are not critical for performance but absolutely necessary for product success.  As you know, I am working on a design that is programmable using "C" source.  It takes 3 true dual port memory blocks and 100 to 200 LUTs.  NO proprietary HW or RISC.

 

 

Bibo.Yang
User Rank
Author
Re: ARM and OpenCL = portability?
Bibo.Yang   12/19/2013 9:07:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi Brian,

I think this portability or vendor independency of OpenCL will kill the enthusiasm of the FPGA vendors to promote this language. Will the same happen to OpenCL as that happened to SystemC a decade ago?

I longed to see A's OpenCL tool to support the ARM+AXI4+FPGA SoC architecture rather than supporting the PC+PCIe+FPGA arch, but this does not happen until now. The hardware platform is not the bottleneck. The CPU and the on-chip Bus has all the power, and the application demands for OpenCL to differentiate the target embeded products are not rare. I believe the reason is not from engineering but from marketing. They need something proprietary to stop the users from easily moving to the other side.

Why does not X get into the OpenCL and A hold on its OpenCL release for SoC arch? Is it because of the Openness of it and the Portability non-issue?

Bibo

Brian at Impulse
User Rank
Author
Re: ARM and OpenCL = portability?
Brian at Impulse   12/19/2013 2:31:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi Karl,

Fool that I am, I can only hope that standards win over "lock-out" spec details re the soft- or hard-core processors. I think ARM is a great opportunity for some inter-brand compatibility to be introduced..... And I share the general skepticism that it will be so.

KarlS01
User Rank
Author
ARM and OpenCL = portability?
KarlS01   12/19/2013 11:35:55 AM
NO RATINGS
"Do you think the fact that ARM and OpenCL's names keep on popping up in both FPGA brands will help increase portability?"

My answer is No.  Aside from the standard interfaces that come with the "ARM" it is the FPGA fabric/design that makes the product, but that still depends on the vendor tool chain.

The task is to design a system rather than an FPGA that is a "smart" peripheral.  A system has many independent functions that range from slow human interaction to critical algorithm calculation.

The point is that a single tool flow and design approach is not appropriate.

And the ASIC world has plenty of cheap ARMs and interfaces.  The main advantage for FPGA is a shorter design time, but the number of cells and wires on the latest dice will probably make P&R times unacceptable.

 

 

KB3001
User Rank
Author
Siftware
KB3001   12/19/2013 6:54:05 AM
NO RATINGS
It is the software ecosystem indeed. More hard processors and high level standard tools are the key, but we have been saying this for years now. .

betajet
User Rank
Author
Re: What about?
betajet   12/18/2013 3:21:01 PM
NO RATINGS
For complex FPGA functionality, I go with Brand X.  For CPLDs, I go with XC9572XL and/or XC9536XL.  If I need more than that, it's time for an FPGA.  For small FPGAs, I've had good luck with ProASIC3 and Igloo from Brand M(A) [Brand M, formerly also known as a different Brand A].  However, if I were given the choice today for a small FPGA I'd certainly check out Brand L, specifically the iCE40 series (formerly known as SB).

I've used Brand A in the past with good luck, but I haven't seen a compelling differentiator between Brand A and Brand X once Brand X improved its tool usability around 2000.  But then, maybe I'm just sore because AHDL didn't catch on :-)

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
What about?
Max The Magnificent   12/18/2013 2:55:41 PM
NO RATINGS
My knee-jerk reaction is that you would be more likely to see something like (A || X || M) & L (where M & L stand for Microsemi and Lattice Semiconductor, respectively). I wonder if anyone would care to comment on this?



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...