Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
tmka
User Rank
Author
Re: FPGA Dev Board Selection: Spartan-6 vs. Artix-7
tmka   6/13/2014 11:47:51 AM
NO RATINGS
Kudos for a very well presented question. I regret that nobody has provided their input.

Half a year later, I am faced with the same question. So adding to it, is there any board with Artix7 and dual HDMI? Or extension boards to accomplish the same?

Fortunately the prices for used Atlys and Nexys 4 boards are reasonable and one can afford to get both.

Beerman58
User Rank
Author
FPGA Dev Board Selection: Spartan-6 vs. Artix-7
Beerman58   12/26/2013 12:21:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Let me start by saying thanks to those of you experienced and enthusiastic EE Times members that have helped to make getting into a new electronics project (such as FPGAs) especially thought provoking at a high level for a relative newbie such as myself.

That said, I was hoping to tap that experience to garner a recommendation for a hardware purchase.  I am interested in an FPGA development board that can double as a learning tool, but most importantly stay relevant as I ramp up to more involved problems very soon.  After a (hopefully) quick USB snooping/hacking beginning project, I am interested in implementing computer vision algorithms into hardware (motion detection, blob detection, pattern recognition, etc. or at least preprocessing of the source image prior to these functions in software), initially using HDMI- and VGA-based inputs and outputs.

I have narrowed it down to two offerings from Digilent (although if someone knows of a perfect fit that I missed, I am definitely interested in hearing it) which are under my budgeted $400 USD.  Initially, the Spartan-6 based Atlys board caught my eye, already having dual HDMI inputs and outputs, and being explicitly used in an HDMI white paper from Xilinx that should speed my development.  But then the 7th generation capacity and new Vivado Design Suite compatibility of the Artix-7 based Nexys 4 board is also intriguing.

Repetition of some high points of each for comparison:
Atlys Board:
    IC: Xilinx Spartan-6 LX45 FPGA
        6,822 slices
        2.1Mbits of fast block RAM
        4 clock tiles, 6 phased-locked loops
        58 DSP slices
        500MHz+ clock speeds
    RAM: 128Mbyte x 16-bit wide DDR2
    Included Ports:
        Two HDMI video input ports & two HDMI output ports
        10/100/1000 Ethernet PHY
    General Use Expansion I/O's: 48
Nexys 4 Board:
    IC: Xilinx Artix-7 XC7A100T
        15,850 logic slices
        4,860 Kbits of fast block RAM
        6 clock tiles, 6 phase-locked loops
        240 DSP slices
        450MHz+ clock speeds
    RAM: 16Mbyte CellularRAM
    Included Ports:
        12-bit VGA output
        10/100 Ethernet PHY
    General Use Expansion I/O's: 40

Which of these two do you think is the best choice for computer vision-related tasks?
From my limited knowledge, it would seem that the decision boils down to the plentiful memory of the Atlys versus the plentiful logic capacity of the Nexys 4 (and it's added bonus of being "newer" and thus further from eventual obsolescence, assuming it's possible to implement HDMI and/or VGA ports on the general I/O's of the Nexys).  Which is more likely to bottleneck a video processing application, memory or capacity?

I don't have the experience to weigh the relative needs of such an application, but if I had to choose today I suppose I'd go with the Atlys only because it has a proven video tutorial available, but I would regret not being able to begin the learning experience with the "new" Vivado toolset.  What do you think?



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...