Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 4   >   >>
User Rank
Basic Tools
RAS2   1/3/2014 2:33:48 PM
If we go with all the tools which are needed the package would cost in the range of $100k(s).
I am wondering if anyone knows what engineers are actually using? 
Are there any statistics on market share for different packages starting from the free ones like PCB Artist? 

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Re: Depends on the complexity
Max The Magnificent   1/3/2014 2:04:32 PM
@Elizabeth: One of these days, I'll actually have time to do one of the "hobbiest" projects I've been contemplating. Probably something with LEDs...

Have you seen my blogs about Adafruit's NewPixels and my Infinity Mirror?

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Re: Some thoughts
Max The Magnificent   1/3/2014 2:01:45 PM
@Garcia: Well, I don't know why but you make me think in Altium Designer. FPGA and Software tools are pretty well integrated in the IDE, including libraries and debugging tools ;-)

And they have a good 3D/mechanical CAD integration...

User Rank
Re: Basic minimum toolset- affordability
elizabethsimon   1/3/2014 1:51:17 PM
If lucky, the younger engineers learn from the older engineers....

If not so lucky they learn by having to troubleshoot their mistakes...


User Rank
Re: getting it right the first time...
elizabethsimon   1/3/2014 1:43:01 PM
Yes, I agree. Having the tools and the knowledge to use them really helps in getting it right the first time.

One thing that I've found though is that one of the biggest factors in getting it right is to have good design reviews. After the last few designs that I did (where we DID get it right the first time) I'm convinced that you can't have too many reviews and you really need to have the right kind of reviews with the right people (engineers with expertise in the area that is being reviewed). I had the project manager breathing down my neck because we were late getting the PCB design done and ended up with the project finishing ahead of schedule becuase we didn't need the second PCB spin.


User Rank
j_b_   1/3/2014 1:25:19 PM
Once upon a time our saying was "All below 10MHz is "continuous current" ... I made a real lot of boards without any simulation and got them right the first time ... up to 270MHz LVDS transfer of video data, with a lot of analog stuff like genlocking, etc. Of course working PCI bus interfaces and a real lot of digital data processing for professional TV station equipment. This went up to 8 layers and a size comparable to todays largest PC graphics boards. Plenty of SMD chips on both sides with up to about 500 pins (or balls) ... all that about 15 years ago. All I needed was the schematics, the PCB layout, the PLD design software and later the FPGA stuff from Xilinx. I also, just once, went up to about 400MHz for something (I believe a satellite receiver board) and even then it worked first time and without any simulation be it power or thermal or whatever. So you CAN work with just schematic and PCB layout tool (most of the time integrated anyway) and of course if you use programmable logic you need to be able to "compile" the VHDL (or Verilog or whatever) for them, but I did my pin-swapping in advance in my head and on paper (and believe me it didn't take long and I always used my chips resources to the limit.). Sorry, but I believe that to some extend it's a question of talent (pls forgive the bragging).


User Rank
tools: PCB routing of clocks....
studleylee   1/3/2014 1:13:20 PM
I had someone say to me yesterday that,"clock nets should be routed shortest as a rule of thumb." I thought about this and it didn't quite ring well for me. I realize clks need to be routed cleanly with minimal angles and vias. Terminated. But I'd think Address and Data should be routed the same lenghts within +/-.150" tolerences if possible. And clock should be equal or slightly longer. The thinking being that the clocking edge should arrive just after data/addr setup, but still allowing hold time before data/addr changes for the next active clk edge.( the timing might also be controlled in the system so skews should be minimized ) Is there such a rule of thumb? ( 6"fr4 ~= 1ns prop )

Then to make things more murky I found these appnotes and on page 16 of each they contradict each other:

"To compensate for the difference in propagation delay, it is
recommended to route the clock signals slightly longer than the address, command, and control signals."

"To compensate for the difference in propagating delay, it
is recommended that the clock signals be roughly equal to or shorter than the address,command, and control signals."

The former does mention coupling capacitance and the second does not.

Any thoughts on this.





User Rank
getting it right the first time...
MWagner_MA   1/3/2014 12:41:48 PM
If you really understand PCB engineering, you will eventually locate tools to help clear various "hurdles" of typical problems that will arise.  A good set of tools and the understanding to apply them will allow you to produce a 100% functional board in ONE revision (assuming less than 500 parts).  Since the lead time to produce a board at reasonable cost is usually a few weeks - it is better approach to spend an extra few days looking at crosstalk, paracitic capacitance, trace impedance, loop area ect.  The physics of how a physical version of a circuit is well known and thus tools have been developed to help us engineers "see these problems".  Until you get to frequencies above 100Mhz, a prototype is useful primarily in optomizing component values, rather than determining a need to revise traces on the board.

User Rank
PCB realization
antedeluvian   1/3/2014 12:13:28 PM

Most people seem to live without tthe ability to make the PCB in house, but there are those router/milling machines for milling PCBs, and not too far in the future (I hope), 3D layout printers.

User Rank
Depends on the complexity
elizabethsimon   1/3/2014 11:55:10 AM
I've actually designed very simple PCBs using just the layout tool and instructions from the mechanical engineer (who presumabley had  some sort of 3D model) Of cours I'm talking about small boards with a couple sensors and pads to hook up the wires. For anything more complex I'll at least use the schematic capture. For most hobbiest stuff you probably don't need much more although I always seem to have to create at least one new part in the library. As Aeroengineer said, these capibilities are merging at the hobiest level so they see it as one package.

On the other hand if you want a complex design to work when it's produced by the thousands then you need to start using the analysis tools.

In my day job, I need to do power and thermal analysis and usually digital/ analog simulation, signal integrety and EMC/EMI on every design. I haven't gotten into the mechanical aspects or FPGA design so I don't personally use those tools but I use the results that are generated.

One of these days, I'll actually have time to do one of the "hobbiest" projects I've been contemplating. Probably something with LEDs...


<<   <   Page 3 / 4   >   >>

Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
<b><a href=Betajet">

The Circle – The Future's Imperfect in the Present Tense
The Circle, a satirical, dystopian novel published in 2013 by San Francisco-based writer Dave Eggers, is about a large, very powerful technology company that combines aspects of Google, ...

Max Maxfield

Recommended Reads From the Engineer's Bookshelf
Max Maxfield
I'm not sure if I read more than most folks or not, but I do I know that I spend quite a lot of time reading. I hate to be idle, so I always have a book or two somewhere about my person -- ...

Martin Rowe

Make This Engineering Museum a Reality
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
Vincent Valentine is a man on a mission. He wants to make the first house to ever have a telephone into a telephone museum. Without help, it may not happen.

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...