Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
betajet
User Rank
Author
Re: Keysight? They Have To Be Kidding...
betajet   1/8/2014 2:35:23 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't hate the name and I haven't been able to find a way to make fun of it.  To me, it's just not memorable.  I'm pretty sure that one month from now I'll see a headline about a new product from Keysight and I'll go "who?"

I appreciate that it's difficult to come up with a good name for a company or product, as many good ones are already taken -- some several times -- but given the richness of language, literature, and mythology it seems one could do pretty well if one worked at it.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: Keysight? They Have To Be Kidding...
MeasurementBlues   1/8/2014 1:58:19 PM
NO RATINGS
@BobsView, it's OK not to like the name. I can't get it in my head so what does that say?

Maligent? Nobody would name a company starting the "Mal." Sounds and looks too much like malignant.

BobsView
User Rank
Author
Keysight? They Have To Be Kidding...
BobsView   1/8/2014 1:50:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Sorry to spoil the party, but I hate the new name.  It reminds me of some cheap electronics company born in the back streets of Hong Kong.

In my opinion, when they were looking to split off the computer business they should have kept name continuity and done the following:

Hewlett Packard: For the traditional Test & Measurment business.

Agilent: For the new computer business (It even sounds new and modern).

Some other name for the Medical and Life Sciences business.  I understand the difficulties in coming up with an original name, but surely a $12 Billion business could do better than Keysight.

How about something like "Magilent" for the Medical business?  I dreamed that up in 10 seconds.  Surely a multi-billion dollar company can come up with something better considering all the time they had to think about it.

 

Bruce Swanson
User Rank
Author
Re: The new name
Bruce Swanson   1/8/2014 11:28:12 AM
NO RATINGS
I like the new name and the explanation behind it.  His description of finding a suitable name was done well.  My work division went through a similar renaming for a product line a few years ago and I learned a lot about all the things that need checking.

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: Interesting
zewde yeraswork   1/8/2014 8:58:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Technology is a very forward-looking industry. It's natural that many of those involved in it aren't really aware of their history.

Vishnu Goel
User Rank
Author
New T&M company is carrying heritage,or baggage?
Vishnu Goel   1/7/2014 11:58:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Welcome the newest T&M company on the horizon! Is it going to be carrying rich heritage,or the baggage of 75 years where so many effort will be required to correct.Vishnu Goel T&M +919810101238

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
May this never happen
MeasurementBlues   1/7/2014 11:27:27 PM
NO RATINGS
There's a linkedIn group call Test & Measurement Marketing and about a year ago, someone started a thread about Danaher acquiring Agilent. That was a huge chunk to swallow and many people, including me, chimed it say that would naver happen and hoped it never would. Now Keysight will "only" be a $3billion company and I still think that likelihood is nil. For one thing, the SEC would probably block such a takeover because Danaher already owns Tektronix, Fluke, and Keithley. Having Keysight under Danaher would kill competition in the T&M business.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: Interesting
MeasurementBlues   1/7/2014 11:21:02 PM
NO RATINGS
More on why the name doesn't matter much to me. I quote myself from a blog I wrote for Test & Measurement World nearly five years ago. The headline is "Agilent came from HP, really"
The headline of this posting may sound absurd to anyone who has used test equipment for more than just the last few years. If you read Test & Measurement World, you probably have some test equipment with an HP logo and you use that equipment every day. But, Agilent split from HP ten years ago, and there's a crop of young engineers who've grown up with Agilent equipment but not necessarily with HP equipment. To them, HP has always been a computer company.

This revelation came to me yesterday while working with several graduate students for our May cover story. I mentioned an HP meter to one of the students by saying "It was manufactured by HP prior to the formation of Agilent."
This caught a 24-year-old grad student by surprise. "You mean Agilent used to be HP?" he said wide-eyed. I explained to him that HP actually started as a test equipment company and split off the business into Agilent in 1999. The student replied "That explains why we have a box in the lab that says HP on it. Now I get it."

In ten years, we will have a generation of engineers who will think Keysight has been around forever. Few will know that Keysight came from Agilent and Agilent came from HP.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: Interesting
MeasurementBlues   1/7/2014 11:13:55 PM
NO RATINGS
In the case of a long-established business, the company name matters less than what Keysight does once it's independent of Agilent. It's the features and quality of the products and the support that matter in the long run. The same was true when Agilent split from HP.

To engineers, it's mostly about what you bring to the table.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: The second page of this article misnames the new company, twice
MeasurementBlues   1/7/2014 10:57:53 PM
NO RATINGS
OK so I like the logo. It means something to engineers. Why red? I'll ask Jay at DesignCon.

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...