Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
resistion
User Rank
Author
Bad time to graduate if you're in EE
resistion   1/8/2014 11:23:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Maybe better to consider a second degree in another field, at least wait out another few years

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Bad time to graduate if you're in EE
rick merritt   1/9/2014 1:10:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Catch the next big wave--biotech!

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: Bad time to graduate if you're in EE
zewde yeraswork   1/9/2014 9:08:33 AM
NO RATINGS
How is it thatthe slowing of Moore's Law is impacting financials so directly? You would think it would be a more gradulal, drawn-out process....

cander111
User Rank
Author
Re: Bad time to graduate if you're in EE
cander111   1/9/2014 12:54:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Funny, my unemployed friends in biotech are not saying that. 

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Bad time to graduate if you're in EE
rick merritt   1/9/2014 5:42:54 PM
NO RATINGS
@cander111: What do those unemployed bioengs say about their outlook?

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
This chart just in
rick merritt   1/9/2014 5:43:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Got the full GSA report with the chart about showing the dramatic decline in VC funding over the last several years. Wow!

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
Re: This chart just in
LarryM99   1/9/2014 8:01:37 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm more on the systems / software side of the industry, so I don't pay as much attention to the semiconductor industry, but this is surprising. Just the other day on CNBC they were analyzing a memory chip company and they made the point that there was not the capacity glut that has happened in the past. Has the industry matured to the point where semiconductors are purely a price-driven commodity?

Jayna Sheats
User Rank
Author
Re: This chart just in
Jayna Sheats   1/9/2014 9:56:51 PM
NO RATINGS
The mental processes of professional investors never cease to amaze.  Mr. Niles says "More importantly" ultrasmall geometries and cost of fab equipment, etc. are responsible for the decision not to invest in fabless semiconductor companies (your historical chart shows that investment in equipment and process disappeared long ago).  The disconnect here is a yawning chasm that not even Geoffrey Moore can cross.

"Rising design complexity" is a valid issue in this context, except that one easily finds a huge number of design opportunities which are not billion-transistor scale.  Has he heard of wireless sensors, mobile medical, embedded computing, etc. etc. (you see I didn't even use the IoT buzzword...)?

DMcCunney
User Rank
Author
Re: This chart just in
DMcCunney   1/9/2014 10:18:42 PM
NO RATINGS
@Jayna Sheats: The mental processes of professional investors never cease to amaze.  Mr. Niles says "More importantly" ultrasmall geometries and cost of fab equipment, etc. are responsible for the decision not to invest in fabless semiconductor companies

You need to read his comments again.  While the chart lists fabless as well as fabed suppliers, he wasn't speaking of just the fabless folks.

But the comment is still applicable, even to fabless suppliers.  As process geometries shrink and costs skyrocket, problems in getting investment will affect the fabless folks, too. After all, fabless simply means "Someone else will actually produce the silicon."  If the someone else runs into problems because of issues getting the financing to keep current on technology, what happens to the fabless shops using them?  (Gee, you have this killer new design using bleeding edge technology you invested an enormous amount in, but you can't get design wins because the only fabs that can manufacture your design don't have the capacity to generate the volume you need, and the fabs you were hoping to use can't get the financing to implement the needed technology?  You might not be long for this world...)

"Rising design complexity" is a valid issue in this context, except that one easily finds a huge number of design opportunities which are not billion-transistor scale.


There certainly are.  But if you are in his part of the financial world, you are looking for huge wins, not bread and butter investments.  The stuff you metion may be profitable, but it probably won't be profitable enough.


Jayna Sheats
User Rank
Author
Re: This chart just in
Jayna Sheats   1/9/2014 11:22:41 PM
I'm not arguing that investment in (expensive) fab capacity is not needed, but it hasn't come from venture capitalists for a long time, and it makes no sense to conflate the issues.  Excess fab capacity goes up and down, but as a matter of current reality there is plenty of money in Asia to build more if the business is there to use it.  I don't see the evidence that semiconductor startups are unable to get their chips made at a market-tolerable cost -quite the contrary.

And as for huge wins, 1x10^9 is not larger than 1000x10^6.  This looking for "killer apps" and "we're not interested unless we're handling a billion $" is just laziness.  Of course every VC would like to have taken those quick profits on Facebook (??); not every mineral deposit is a mother lode.  (And the entire output of the California gold rush is estimated to be slightly more than one year's output from the rather mundane methods of mining gold in the U.S. today.  It is only an analogy but it is entirely apt.)  The Internet of Things silicon volume, taking the average of the estimates of many analysts, will be comparable to the PC if not greater.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...