Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
DMcCunney
User Rank
Author
Decouple the microphone from the voice recognition device
DMcCunney   1/14/2014 7:22:54 PM
NO RATINGS
@Max: However, there is a bit of a "gotcha" to all of this, which is the fact that the majority of existing voice processing solutions, such as those employed by smartphone applications, are of a type known as "near-field." Basically, the "near-field" moniker refers to the fact that the user's mouth is "up close and personal" with regard to the microphone on the smartphone. When it comes to controlling things remotely, we need solutions that are capable of far-field voice input processing (FFVIP), which involves a whole new set of challenges.

Depending upon where we are, maybe we don't.

In the home automation scenario described, for example, it would make more sense if there were a number of microphones scattered throughout the residence, so the occupant was always "near field" to one.  The user would speak and say something like "Alarm clock, please wake me at 6am tomorrow"  The microphone nearest the user would pick it up, and transmit it over the home network to the device handling voice processing, which would route the command to the specified device.  There would be no need for the user to be in close proximity to the device being controlled - only in proximity to a microphone that could pick up the command.

Wilton.Helm
User Rank
Author
Multiple microphones
Wilton.Helm   1/14/2014 3:41:44 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm not sure what's up with tablets.  My three year old Droid X has three microphones, specifically for noise canceling purposes.  I'm sure it's not as elaborate as conexant's approach, but it does a pretty good job of sparing my callers from hearing my car stereo or wind noise when they call me.  And its quite a bit smaller than a tablet.



Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
IoT Network Shoot Out
July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday

Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.

Brought to you by

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.