Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
betajet
User Rank
CEO
Re: Why "All Programmable SoC"?
betajet   1/23/2014 2:25:21 PM
NO RATINGS
I think Xilinx was originally going to call Zynq "your plastic pal who's fun to be with", but discovered it was trademarked by the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation :-)

Originally Xilinx had traditional IC names like XC2000, XC3000, and XC4000 series.  This was back when every digital designer knew most of the 7400-series parts by heart, including their pinouts.  All you needed to sell a chip was a good part number, like "555" (mmmmmm).

Then Xilinx begat Virtex.  I don't know what that name means.  Then Xilinx begat Spartan, which is a great name because it immediately suggests "lean and mean", a nice clean architecture at an affordable price.  Spartan also has a great logo.  I've made some nice designs using Spartan IIE and Spartan 3A.

However, lately it seem that Xilinx has hired the SCC marketing people who managed to escape the firing squad.  What the heck do Kintex and Artix mean?  Quick, which one is the expensive one?  I don't know either.  As names go, Zynq isn't too bad IMO.  At least it suggests that your product is galvanized!

As for "All Programmable", to me it's pure Sirius Cybernetics marketing, like Microsoft's "All In" campaign.  I would like to see "All Programmable" fade away.  For one thing, Xilinx chips aren't All-Programmable.  You can't program the bit stream yourself: you must use Xilinx tools.  That, IMO, is completely at odds with the claim that it's All-Programmable.  That's like saying that a computer you can only program in BASIC is somehow "general-purpose".

JMO/YMMV

[Yes, I realize that the "A" in BASIC stands for "all-purpose".  I think that helps prove my point.]

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Why "All Programmable SoC"?
Max The Magnificent   1/23/2014 1:22:32 PM
NO RATINGS
@Sanjib: Why is the Zynq SoC called "All Programmable" SoC?

The problem is that when FPGAs were first developed, they comprised a simple array (8x8) of logic cells, wich with a 4-input lookup table, and that was it. The FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) moniker was intended to play off the (then-popular) gate-array ASIC technology.

Over time FPGAs started to have more and more "stuff" inside, inlcuding high-speed serial interconnect, a variety of comms cores, and, of course, hard processor cores. Xilinx started using the name "All Programmable" and applying it to:

All Programmable SoCs (the Zynq)

All Programmable FPGAs

All Programmable 3D ICs (multiple FPCG and other IC cores on a common silicon interposer presented in a single package)

In th ecase of th eZynq, the way I take it is that the entire device is programmable -- but in different ways -- the ARM cores are programmed like processors and the programmable fabric is configured (programmed) like a regular FPGA.

Sanjib.A
User Rank
CEO
Why "All Programmable SoC"?
Sanjib.A   1/23/2014 1:04:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Why is the Zynq SoC called "All Programmable" SoC? Are the ARM 9 cores not hard-coded into the fabric? Is the term "AP SoC", some kind of brand name given to the Xilinx Zynq SoC or is because there are some additional pragramming flexibility features these Zynq SoCs have compared the those from Xilinx's competitors (such as Altera)? 



Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
<b><a href=Betajet">

The Circle – The Future's Imperfect in the Present Tense
Betajet
1 Comment
The Circle, a satirical, dystopian novel published in 2013 by San Francisco-based writer Dave Eggers, is about a large, very powerful technology company that combines aspects of Google, ...

Max Maxfield

Recommended Reads From the Engineer's Bookshelf
Max Maxfield
6 comments
I'm not sure if I read more than most folks or not, but I do I know that I spend quite a lot of time reading. I hate to be idle, so I always have a book or two somewhere about my person -- ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
2 comments
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
16 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...