Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
Re: We already monitor ambient light
DrQuine   1/28/2014 10:10:34 PM
My iPhone has an "auto-brightness" setting (although I cannot see any effect - perhaps my case blocks the sensor). What I don't understand from the article is how the RGB information would be used. Is the point that with light source information it would be possible to selectively brighten the colors that are being washed out by the ambient light while keeping the colors that are not present in the ambient light dim? How well does this work in practice? The human eye is very good at color correcting based upon the ambient light color temperature. If incandescent light is shifting the ambient colors towards the red end of the spectrum, the blue components of an image are "auto enhanced" and need not be so bright. If the Intersil technology utilizes this effect, it might save energy.

User Rank
Re: We already monitor ambient light
elctrnx_lyf   1/28/2014 10:39:09 AM
Is this really makes any difference from the existing ambient light sensor?

User Rank
Re: We already monitor ambient light
daleste   1/27/2014 8:41:18 PM
Good to see a new product from Intersil.  Hope it does well in the market.

User Rank
Re: We already monitor ambient light
Naresh.Shetty   1/27/2014 8:08:52 PM
The digital ALS has built in amplifiers, ADCs and I2C resources to interface directly to a SoC or any uC, making ALS implementation efficient, as compared to a standalone photodiode. ISL29125 do provide independent RGB information of the light source, which is used to measure correlated color temperature (CCT) along with  Lux value.

User Rank
RGB to identify light source
Naresh.Shetty   1/27/2014 7:38:24 PM
This is Naresh Shetty with Intersil. I wanted to take the opportunity to answer a couple of questions that were raised in the article. Today, ALS is used for ambient light intensity – as opposed to light source information – to  manage brightness. Since device displays are translucent, a user's color perception changes depending on the source rather than intensity. RGB is currently the only way to identify light source (sunlight, fluorescent, incandescent, etc.) and therefore remains the only way to effectively adapt a display based on light. With respect to OLED solutions specifically, RGB is particularly useful for improving aging OLED display characteristics on large screens. Today, it's true that RGB is not as cost-effective for smartphone screens for the purposes of monitoring/adapting to OLED ageing.

User Rank
Please explain your claim
Bill_Jaffa   1/27/2014 2:14:30 PM
Can you in any way substantiate your first-sentence remark, "After being off the tech radar in recent years" re Intersil? It seems very unfair to them to make such a blanket statement, and then not back it up at all in the article. It's a "dig" at them without backup. (I have no vested interest or pro/con bias with respect to Intersil, I just don't like to see such broad statements made so casually.)

User Rank
We already monitor ambient light
kwerner068   1/27/2014 2:02:43 PM
Of course, measurinig ambient light for the purpose of intelligently dimming and brightening the display backlight is important.  Unfortunately, this article does not make clear we do this already.  The measurement is typically done with a single sensor, most commonly a photodiode, that more or less mimics the spectral response of the human eye.

What these ambient light sensors (ALSs) do not do is measure red, green, and blue light independently.  So the question is whether the Intersil sensor can produce sufficiently increased user satisfaction to justify its (presumably) higher cost.  The answer to that question is not at all clear.  

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
low-power, sensors
zewde yeraswork   1/27/2014 10:37:25 AM
Both low-power and sensor technologies are trending heavily these days. Obviously, mobile devices are still booming for the fourth or fifth year in a row--so a confluence of interests makes sense here.

Most Recent Comments
Susan Rambo
rick merritt
Brian Fuller2

Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.

Brought to you by

July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday
IoT Network Shoot Out
Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...