Whatever the government does, the unemployment remains at historically high levels and that's frustrating. If you are lucky enough, you may pull a Jonah and get job, but in most cases you have to work hard and attend lots of interviews to reach the goal. I know that good resume is essential for successful job search and I'd recommend http://resumewritinglab.com/ . Very often people don't believe, but in fact the CV is the first information your potential employer learns about you and it's very important to have it well-written and clear. It doesn't mean tht you'll get hired in a matter of seconds but at least it enhances chances.
The problem with America today? Personally, I have no problem with people disagreeing with a point I'm trying to make. It amazes me, however, when it's done in an unprofessional manner. Thank you for taking the time to post. And, I wasn't an English major, and have never been unemployed.
There is not an iota of original thought anywhere in this blog and it does EE Times no credit at all to insert these page fillers. The problem of America today is far too many of these unemployable English majors allowed to speak on Technology ( or for that matter almost anything else ) and being taken seriously.
Who has lost their job to technology? You have to go back to loom workers losing their jobs to textile mills. The current unemployment is not technology related. The tech booms of the 80's and 90's created more jobs than were lost. Technology enables us to do things we are not otherwise able to do. Try chopping down a tree with your bare hands. The current bottleneck on the ladder to success is caused by pushing from the bottom when we should be pulling from the top. We keep worrying about what is going to happen to our least skilled workers when we should questioning whether our most skilled workers are working up to their potential. Our highest skilled workers are the ones who will create new industries and more jobs at all levels of employment.
Sometimes Asterisk (star) or hash works...not often. My employer's callcentre menu designers put in an (unprompted) option of 7 for us to bypass the menus if we are out in the field and need to use the callcentre as a switchboard to get thru to someone. Very good thinking, that. So try anything that's not in the prompts!
I'll tell you one thing that people - any people - are good for. Call Centre phone operators. I phoned my bank yesterday and the amount of key pressing and voice recognition I had to go through to get to a real person who could do what I wanted, was unreal. By the time I got to a real person I was ready to change banks, but I don't think that would have helped - they're all the same.....
I suppose it depends where you are or maybe where you are coming from.
I attended a conference on robotics once and encountered a young man (well I was at the same time) who feared robotics taking away jobs while the group I counted myself in was happily looking forward to the time when robots would take over some of our tasks so we'd have more time for other things.
He was unemployed and looking for work and we were employed and looking for less.
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.