Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
Author
Re:
prabhakar_deosthali   2/7/2014 8:15:34 AM
NO RATINGS
Seems like Sony is following the way IBM exited from all kind of PC and server hardware business.

But Sony has to decide fast which way it wants to reinvent itself . Sony has been known as a consumer electronics company - TV, cameras, Laptops and the smartphones.

Not sure how it will cope with the new wave products like wearable devices and IoT stuff.
 

alex_m1
User Rank
Author
virtual reality
alex_m1   2/7/2014 6:37:56 AM
NO RATINGS
It's too early to exit CE. Virtual reality could be a very big industry.There a lot of excitment from gamers and others.

 

And Sony is building a VR headset.Reviews say it's far better than occulus rift, the other commercial competitior, and it comapres to Valve which is has the best research prototype(and doesn't intent to market it). And sony could use it position in gaming to grab a big share.

But since the PS4 is relatively underpowered for virtual reality(it's only powerfull as a mid range pc) , that means sony will have to face some difficult strategic choices.Will it sacrifice PS4 for the next market ? . It would be interesting to see how this plays.


BTW 150,000 is the number of employees accross sony electronics,entertainments and finance. How many are there in electronics ?

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Wow TVs too
junko.yoshida   2/7/2014 5:18:14 AM
NO RATINGS
@resistion, that's a good question. Does Sony have the right sensing technology? I don't know. Well, they can always buy what hey need, too. But you are asking a better question. Do they have "the right resources" ( to acquire what they need, identify apps, find partners and customers, and pull the team together)? It remains to be seen.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Not like this hasn't happened before
junko.yoshida   2/7/2014 5:11:45 AM
NO RATINGS
@Bert, you made an excellent point here. Many of these erstwhile CE brands in the U.S. you mentioned here either disappeared or re-invented themselves. So, why wouldn't Sony be able to pull that off?

resistion
User Rank
Author
Wow TVs too
resistion   2/7/2014 4:24:51 AM
NO RATINGS
I also bought Sony TV before too. Seems may be more than just PC demand problem now.

Sensing sounds promising. But do they have the right resources for it.

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
Not like this hasn't happened before
Bert22306   2/6/2014 8:32:57 PM
NO RATINGS
US CE companies like GE, Magnavox, Admiral, RCA, Westinghouse, Stromberg Carlson, Fisher, and a whole host of others, have had to get out of the CE business and either reinvent themselves or disappear entirely. Sony is dealing with that same problem.

My thinking was that Sony could get involved in this IoT field and in smart cars. Both require new sensor types, so their interest in sensors could make a good fit. I agree that they don't need to keep making boxes. For example, Qualcomm, some years ago, stopped making boxes and started building only chipsets. So even this type of reinvention of a name brand is not novel.

Yes, it's a huge change for Sony, but hardly unprecedented. Why should Sony be immune to this, might be a better question. The CE business is extremely competitive. Sony's products were always priced higher than the competition, so it's not surprising that competing against the newest low bidders, China/Taiwan and Korea, was going to be difficult.

<<   <   Page 3 / 3


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...