Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
I'm hungry for details
rick merritt   2/12/2014 2:33:16 PM
NO RATINGS
I've reached out to a couple Google contacts for an interview, but given the secretive posture the search giant historically has taken around its data center technologies, I don't expect any substantive responses any time soon.

That said, I am ready any time for an interview with anyone who knows more about this topic.

AnySilicon
User Rank
Freelancer
Android
AnySilicon   2/12/2014 2:55:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Could it be a CPU optimized for Android that Google can sell together with their OS? it the only link I see to the mobile market & IoT.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
Re: I'm hungry for details
krisi   2/12/2014 2:56:02 PM
NO RATINGS
This is pretty cool development for all IC design guys...I am hungry for any info too

TonyTib
User Rank
CEO
Maybe it's exploratory
TonyTib   2/12/2014 3:59:32 PM
NO RATINGS
I was at a motor control seminar last year; 3 Google employees attended, but wouldn't say why they were there .  My guess is just to learn.

_hm
User Rank
CEO
Good News
_hm   2/12/2014 5:57:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Good News that Google is rampingup efforts for chip design. These should be for more consumer product design. For these type of products one need to have custom design ICs.

Along with processing, it will involve MEMS and other mixed signal technology.

GSMD
User Rank
Manager
Re: I'm hungry for details
GSMD   2/12/2014 7:59:30 PM
NO RATINGS
One of their IC guys has a blog and talks about design issues. Came across it when I was looking for Chisel users (the new scala based HDL brom UCB, we use it in our open processor project). Blog is danluu.com. Used to design x86 processors earlier. Yiu may want to talk to him.

 

 

betajet
User Rank
CEO
I would guess custom search engine
betajet   2/12/2014 8:15:03 PM
NO RATINGS
There's no point in Google making consumer chips.  Allwinner and MediaTek can make such chips cheaper than Google.  It would be like Google making its own phones -- they're much better off setting the software standard and letting their partners compete against each other to drive the price down.

Besides, why does Google have Android?  So that people can get access to mobile advertising, because that's how Google makes money -- selling advertising.  And they target their advertising based on what you've searched for.  Search is the crown jewels, and it takes a phenomenal amount on computing power and electricity.

So here you have a well-defined highly-parallel problem.  Sounds like a perfect application for custom silicon.  Instead of interpreting search software on a general-purpose CPU, do it directly in hardware so that data isn't being copied redundantly, which is what really consumes the energy.  If custom silicon cuts the Google electric bill in half and doubles the performance of each data center, the silicon pays for itself pretty quickly.  And I'm just being conservative with that factor of 2.

JMO/YMMV

GSMD
User Rank
Manager
Re: I would guess custom search engine
GSMD   2/12/2014 8:28:43 PM
NO RATINGS
It would be interesting in Google actually started making mobile SoCs and peddled them as ref parts optimized for Android. We can finally get stable, performance optimzed devices with bug-free codecs and stable browsers. Of course never going to happen since it makes no business sense.

In a  larger sense, the problem is not android fragmentation but proliferation of ARM variants. They are all pretty much the same (I am talking about variants using ARM hard macros) and the dversity does not buy you much. Lesser number of variants may help SW stability.

Devashish Paul
User Rank
Apprentice
Re: I'm hungry for details
Devashish Paul   2/12/2014 8:35:09 PM
Rick, whether you are Google or Baidu, I can't see any benefit in just doing Vanilla processors that you can get from any ARM or x86 vendor. I'd imagine that you want to integrate CPU, GPU and fabric into a single low latency, highly integrated SoC. I'd imagine that something highly optimized for compute along the lines of what you'd get if you integrate Xeon + nVidea + fabric would be where you want to go to cram in a lot of compute at data center scale with low latency without the overhead of a lot of NICs etc and keep system level power down.  Trying squeeze down power and latency around what Intel gives you is probably not going to cut it.

markhahn0
User Rank
Rookie
processor in memory in network
markhahn0   2/12/2014 9:36:29 PM
NO RATINGS
If I were with Google, I wouldn't be satisfied with shaking up SDN, or tweaking out some minor mod of a conventional CPU node.  I think that's what's so tedious about all the coverage of FB's boring form-factor changes.

Google is in a position where they can look at fundamental changes in programming mode, in ways that conventional suppliers can't.  For instance, GPUs have demonstrated that there's a LOT of parallelism out there, in spite of the horrible programming model.  Google could be putting dram in-package.  They could find a nice uniform way to address large numbers of these nodes (sort of a merged network/dram fabric).  If you really go SDN, it doesn't make a lot of sense to stick with the artifacts of traditional ethernet designs (subnets, vlans, ISO layers).

People usually think of this "custom or not to go custom" question as hinging on how much of the conventional architecture can be jettisoned.  (ie, if your nodes have nothing but cpu, dram, flash and fabric, you sure don't need 8 ports of SATA or a 6-port USB3 controller.  but you probably do want some kind of management coprocessor)  But Google should be thinking about more fundamental change, not just subtractions...

Page 1 / 4   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
2 comments
An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely unfamiliar. ...

Max Maxfield

What's the Best Traveling Toolkit?
Max Maxfield
14 comments
A few years ago at a family Christmas party, I won a pocket knife as part of a "Dirty Santa" game. This little scamp was a Buck 730 X-Tract. In addition to an incredibly strong and sharp ...

Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer

Future Engineers: Don’t 'Trip Up' on Your College Road Trip
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer
10 comments
A future engineer shares his impressions of a recent tour of top schools and offers advice on making the most of the time-honored tradition of the college road trip.

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
41 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)