Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 5 / 7   >   >>
betajet
User Rank
Author
I never metastable I liked
betajet   2/13/2014 7:52:31 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm concerned about the GALS (Globally Asynchronous, Locally Synchronous) approach.  Aren't you going to have metastability problems with multiple clock islands?  Wouldn't one be better off with all islands having the same clock frequency, but with relaxed timing between islands?

Garcia-Lasheras
User Rank
Author
Re: Not what Moore's Law says
Garcia-Lasheras   2/13/2014 7:22:12 PM
NO RATINGS
@tpfj: "Really what I'm saying is the laws of physics that are currently kicking our asses will unfortunately still apply to asynchronous circuits, and hence should then suffer in similar ways."

I completely agree with you in this point. Indeed, the really worthy advantages comes from other side effects derived from this situation, not from a direct speed advantage.

The main message I pretended to explain, is that our live has been easy as we had not needed to pay attention to datapath internal geometry for a long while by using synchronous design, but now the paradigm has changed and clock starts to be a problem by itself.

The huge clock network in modern ICs sucks as many as 50% of the total power being wasted. For this reason, there are most practical applications of async circuits in RFID cards, in which async MCUs are heavily used.

In addition, the lack of a global clock with a fixed frequency reduces the EMI by orders of magnitude in async parts. For this reason, Async is used too in low power wireless communication modems.

And the list goes on... ;-)

 

tpfj
User Rank
Author
Re: Not what Moore's Law says
tpfj   2/13/2014 6:58:41 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, the trend is collapsing. Surprisingly, Moore's component, ie. circuit density, is the one that is holding out the longest. We lost speed a long time ago, we lost power fairly recently, we are now rapidly losing silicon $ cost (just look to current process node fab and related mask costs). I don't believe that asynchronous circuits will solve this either. Sure they will scoop out all those currently wasted picoseconds on the non-critical synchronous paths as well as any delay savings through flops that will be absent from an asynchronous equivalent design. But realistically, how much of an advantage do you think this will give you against a well balanced (ie many paths near critical speed) sychronous equivalent. I doubt it is double? Also, remember, a synchronous circuit gives you inherent parallism through pipe-lining. How do you achieve the same parallism asychronously? Really what I'm saying is the laws of physics that are currently kicking our asses will unfortunately still apply to asynchronous circuits, and hence should then suffer in similar ways.

Garcia-Lasheras
User Rank
Author
Re: I love asynchronous logic
Garcia-Lasheras   2/13/2014 6:43:40 PM
NO RATINGS
@Max: "Also she is your mother-in-law's daughter. Now my head hurts. Have you ever heard that song: I'm My Own Grandpa?"

Now, I'm comlpetely lost. I'm glad to see there is a flow diagram indicating the relations... but I've gotten crazy after the first minute -- I need mor colors in the map LOL

Garcia-Lasheras
User Rank
Author
Re: Not what Moore's Law says
Garcia-Lasheras   2/13/2014 6:36:19 PM
NO RATINGS
OK, Mr. Moore is the most reliable voice in order to define his own law.

Now, lets define what costs means nowadays when building a new IC:

There are:
  • costs in delay, that translates in speed
  • costs in power consumption
  • costs in the silicon real-state area a transistor occupies in a chip
  • costs in the monetary expenses for building a transistor at a given process node.

Less call it Moore's law, Javi's law or tpfj's law: the point is that such a profitable trend has started to collapse, no matter how do we want to call it ;-)

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: I love asynchronous logic
Max The Magnificent   2/13/2014 6:30:02 PM
NO RATINGS
@Garcia: She used to be my girlfriend, now she is my daughter's mom and, as a side effect, my wife LOL.

Also she is your mother-in-law's daughter. Now my head hurts. Have you ever heard that song: I'm My Own Grandpa?

Garcia-Lasheras
User Rank
Author
Re: I love asynchronous logic
Garcia-Lasheras   2/13/2014 6:24:12 PM
NO RATINGS
@Max: "Ah, but is Rebeca the name of your wife or your girlfriend?"

She used to be my girlfriend, now she is my daughter's mom and, as a side effect, my wife LOL

tpfj
User Rank
Author
Re: Not what Moore's Law says
tpfj   2/13/2014 6:21:14 PM
NO RATINGS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore's_law

"Several measures of digital technology are improving at exponential rates related to Moore's law, including the size, cost, density and speed of components. Moore himself wrote only about the density of components (or transistors) at minimum cost."

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: I love asynchronous logic
Max The Magnificent   2/13/2014 6:19:25 PM
NO RATINGS
@Gracia: I tell this to my wife at least twice a week ... the good thing is that Rebeca understands...

Ah, but is Rebeca the name of your wife or your girlfriend?

Garcia-Lasheras
User Rank
Author
Re: Not what Moore's Law says
Garcia-Lasheras   2/13/2014 6:13:15 PM
@tpfj: "joore's Law says nothing about speed and everything about circuit density"

Moore law is all about jumping from one process node to the next and the overal exponential advantage. Density, Speed and Power consumption are all related with the transistor shrinking process.

Moore's law is meaningless beyond CMOS or derivatives, as it badly collapses when data communication replaces data processing as the most expensive process in terms of power consumption, propagation delay, occupied layout area and, of course, monetary cost.

Remeber that by just adding cores/logic, you cannot increase the overall performance in General Purpose Programming.

Back in the nineties, CPU were sold by highlighting their clock speed, as this was really the parameter that supposed an advantage in day to day application. e.g. office suite, graphics, boot-up time.

<<   <   Page 5 / 7   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC3649 step-down regulator combines key features of a ...
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...