Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
goafrit
User Rank
Author
Re: self powered chips
goafrit   3/12/2014 5:06:15 PM
NO RATINGS
>> We are looking into a Plutonium chip which we expect to self power a SOC and external memory.

You may need to use any description as most may be turned off by knowing Plutonium is inside your product. What if there is fire and the thing explodes? Are they safe?. Think of the reason we have MRI as a name to hide what makes people uncomfortable.

goafrit
User Rank
Author
Re: Not the end, just a different model
goafrit   3/12/2014 5:02:49 PM
NO RATINGS
>> If the hypothesis is that semiconductor innovation requires VC investment in semiconductor manufacturing, I disagree.

I am not sure anyone is talking about fab. We are discussing fabless strategy where innovation in circuits and systems rule and dominate. If you check very well, we are not attracting a lot of dollars in the design innovation phase. No one is talking of the production innovation - that is not a VC kind of game.

betajet
User Rank
Author
Re: Free-as-in-Freedom Software is key
betajet   2/28/2014 6:12:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Broadcom has just released documentation and source code for their VideoCore IV processor, which is the GPU in Raspberry Pi's BCM2835 SoC.  Here are the links:

RasPi Announcement

Broadcom Announcement

I've rarely been this happy to eat my words.  May this be the start of a return to open documentation so that engineers and programmers can fully use the parts that they buy.

toney
User Rank
Author
self powered chips
toney   2/22/2014 5:01:18 PM
NO RATINGS
I am working with a small (4 bedrooms in Huntsville and 1 barn in Toney) startup.  We are looking into a Plutonium chip which we expect to self power a SOC and external memory.  Wish us luck!

CC VanDorne
User Rank
Author
Re: Govt. vs Pvt funding of R&D
CC VanDorne   2/19/2014 6:08:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting.  I recommend that you amend the wikipedia entry on Intel's early history as it does not mention this association:

"Early history: At its founding, Intel was distinguished by its ability to make semiconductors. Its first product, in 1969, was the 3101 Schottky TTL bipolar 64-bit static random-access memory (SRAM), which was nearly twice as fast as earlier Schottky diode implementations by Fairchild and the Electrotechnical Laboratory in Tsukuba, Japan.

In the same year Intel also produced the 3301 Schottky bipolar 1024-bit read-only memory (ROM) and the first commercial metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) silicon gate SRAM chip, the 256-bit 1101. Intel's business grew during the 1970s as it expanded and improved its manufacturing processes and produced a wider range of products, still dominated by various memory devices."

Also, if Intel's "first product" was in 1969 and the Apollo mission were from 1961 to 1975, then that begs for many questions your assertion, like, which Apollo mission do you refer to below?  And how many device did those rocket use?  Enough to sustain Intel's quick early growth?  That's not likely, even at the out-of-control prices that govt. pays.  That leaves direct funding then.  NASA directly funded Intel's develpment of the products listed above?  How much?  Were there any other significant investors or would Intel have failed to launch (pun intended) without NASA's (ah.. I mean our father's) money?

CC VanDorne
User Rank
Author
Dang, I would like to have been there..
CC VanDorne   2/19/2014 5:09:34 PM
NO RATINGS
There are few of these types of shows that I regret not being able to attend.  This one looks like a glaring exception to that rule.  I would love to have been there to hear these movers and shakers speak.

Thanks for the consolation prize, Rick.

chipmonk0
User Rank
Author
Re: Govt. vs Pvt funding of R&D
chipmonk0   2/19/2014 5:09:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Apollo & other NASA programs, replacing magnetic core memory with solid state, intel's bread and butter before developing the 4004

CC VanDorne
User Rank
Author
Re: Govt. vs Pvt funding of R&D
CC VanDorne   2/19/2014 4:55:40 PM
NO RATINGS
"After all he is still walking on the path created by others like Bob Noyce that was first charted with Govt. / Taxpayer money."



Chipmonk, please provide details here:  What govt program?  When was it started and for what purpose?  Then how was Bob Noyce in volved in said program?

Thanks, CC

chanj0
User Rank
Author
Hardware and Software Cycle
chanj0   2/18/2014 1:39:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Every development has a cycle. Computer gets faster and faster everyday. A regular user probably don't feel a different between a 3 years old laptop and today's laptop. However, more products and information are moved to the Internet. Those require software engineers to develop. In addition, today's web-based application isn't so easy anymore. A software engineer can hardly go by with knowing only 3 languages. Today belongs to software engineer. Yet, for example, when there is a breakthrough of semiconductor such as using different material than silicon, hardware engineer will thrive again.

makhtar972
User Rank
Author
Salaries for Hardware Engineers
makhtar972   2/18/2014 12:22:23 AM
NO RATINGS
As a Hardware engineer, I find this,

"We continue hiring software developers at a higher rate than hardware engineers"

to be SAD / FRUSTRATING. Especially when it comes from a chip design company. 

 

RTL Coding <---> App Developement.

Verification <----> C++ Coding

Physical Design <---> Backend User Database management.

In my opinion, the jobs on the left are more difficult / demanding / time consuming. Yet jobs on the right get paid more.

Who / What is responsibile for that?

Page 1 / 4   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
resistion
 
Ron Neale
 
KAGoldberg
 
Kevin Neilson
 
resistion
 
traneus
 
betajet
 
R_Colin_Johnson
 
Bert22306
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...