Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
skunkwerk
User Rank
Author
how it works
skunkwerk   2/26/2014 11:15:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I wrote up a detailed explanation of how the technology works (and why it could revolutionize more than just communications) on my blog here: http://bit.ly/1ptNbdY in case anyone is curious.

dimopep
User Rank
Author
distributed MU-MIMO
dimopep   2/22/2014 10:43:02 AM
NO RATINGS
I think it should be fair to call it "heavily distributed multi-user MIMO". In fact they are forming the beam by relating to the multiple AP as a dezentralized antenna array, a concept that should be well known in radar applications and acoustic beamforming.


Btw. an interessting press release about NSN's centralized-RAN solution:

http://www.rethink-wireless.com/2014/02/20/nsn-delivers-centralized-ran-new-cells.htm


It seems that this year's MWC will offer some stuff to think about.

Michael.Bergman
User Rank
Author
Re: No turning Shannon on its head
Michael.Bergman   2/21/2014 4:12:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting.  I would have said that the main difference is their reliance on aggreagating multiple APs signal to make the desired signal.  This could be considered MIMO, I suppose, but only very loosely.  It would be feasible to have this and MIMO operating together, if I understand the system.

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
Re: No turning Shannon on its head
Bert22306   2/21/2014 3:34:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Note that any MIMO system also has to do channel estimation, and especially if the MIMO is used by mobile devices, the channel estimation has to be done quickly. So even this aspect is not new.

I think the main differences between this DIDO and MIMO are that the different APs may be a lot further apart with DIDO than your typical single MIMO antenna, and the propagation paths are used individually by each client system.

Here is a good viewgraph tutorial which explains how the signals are decorrelated in MIMO. I think you will note the similarities between the two schemes.

http://www.ieee.li/pdf/viewgraphs/wireless_mimo.pdf

dimopep
User Rank
Author
Not exactly a Breakthrough
dimopep   2/21/2014 2:32:21 PM
What we see here offered is a distributed MU-MIMO technology, similar to LTE-A's centralized CoMP. And thus it will inevitably face the same problems, e.g. cell edge performance, low mobility, unfavorable channel correlation, etc. Despite of this the claimed spectral efficiency gains and the promised scalability in my opinion do not hold for the LTE latency requirements and this will be sharpened further with 5G.

But one truly intriguing aspect of this product is the opportunity to provide a low cost solution to one of the Telco's problems, namely how to cover temporary events attracting huge amounts of users. A comparison of the power consumption, size and price of the offered AP to a state of the art base station should ring the bells for a nice niche market opportunity.

Anyway the future of beamforming in celuar is more than bright and the guys deserve kudos for the work they do. Regarding the statements made in the press... well, we all know that maketing doesn't go with engineering very well =)

 

Wobbly
User Rank
Author
Re: moving clients
Wobbly   2/21/2014 1:48:56 PM
NO RATINGS
It will be interesting to see how this compares to dense deployments of small cells operating under SON, particularly with carrier aggregation and LTE over unlicensed bands. I think the band width density on that kind of deployment will challenge this, with no change to existing mobiles, no change to exiting protocols. The deployment will require more difficult backhaul engineering, but even that, using microwave aggregation is not that difficult. Small cells are small enough to build into building facades or into street lighting fixtures, so siting them is not an issue as it is with conventional towers.

 

I still think that what Artemis has achieved is very interesting, I just don't know if it makes commercial sense. Small cells have evolved rapidly under LTE, which was engineered to take small cells and Self Organizing Networks into account. I think you are going to see the results of that in 2015, particularly in regards to Heterogenous networks.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Author
Re: moving clients
wilber_xbox   2/21/2014 12:10:52 PM
NO RATINGS
The technology will probably be better for static devices such as TV live streaming either through dedicated hardware or through some kind of mobile device. The spectrum loading is already difficult with poor network in moving devices. Also in congested areas the technology will be difficult to implement as there will be too much interference. 

Wobbly
User Rank
Author
moving clients
Wobbly   2/21/2014 11:47:43 AM
NO RATINGS
What is the processing load to handle handsets that are moving? Say at 25 MPH on a bus. Do you have to have an overlay network with traditional towers handling clients moving above a certain rate and this network handling more stationary clients?

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: No turning Shannon on its head
zewde yeraswork   2/21/2014 9:08:33 AM
NO RATINGS
It's not just about the data center, there's plenty in the channel model matrix that has to be performed outside of the data center. The requirements for this kind of thing are massive. It's a major undertaking.

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: No turning Shannon on its head
zewde yeraswork   2/21/2014 9:04:10 AM
NO RATINGS
That's true, the real test is how it does in real time not how it does in a static demo.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
IoT Network Shoot Out
July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday

Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.

Brought to you by

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.