Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
resistion
User Rank
Author
Resistance
resistion   2/25/2014 4:15:46 PM
NO RATINGS
I cannot avoid finding larger resistance for coil than TSV. Plus larger area, I'm not sure the advantage.

resistion
User Rank
Author
Parallel alternative
resistion   2/25/2014 7:49:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Actually besides these options, need to think about the use of extended mutual inductance, of course there could be cumulative losses from more being linked together to extend the distance.

Kinnar
User Rank
Author
Re: Your take
Kinnar   2/25/2014 2:07:01 AM
NO RATINGS
The authors of that paper were, Yoshida, Y. Keio Univ., Fujisawa, Nose, K. ; Nakagawa, Y. ; Noguchi, K. ; Morita, Y. ; Tago, M. ; Kuroda, T. ; Mizuno, M.

 

resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: Your take
resistion   2/25/2014 1:08:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Practically, a coil probably takes up the space of multiple TSVs, so I would expect either SerDes or FDM to be necessary.

resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: Wireless power?
resistion   2/24/2014 11:56:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, the coil impedance losses and required dimensions are nontrivial considerations in the design. On the other hand, TSVs are not a walk in the park either. I think the potential to NOT continually thin the silicon is quite promising. Not to mention the fragility or increased thermal risk, but there is less competitive difference from monolithic approaches.

DrQuine
User Rank
Author
Communicating between stacked chips
DrQuine   2/24/2014 9:58:13 PM
NO RATINGS
I wonder about the "potential" for external electromagnetic interference. Slight offsets in positioning might also result in changes of signal amplitude with the risk of digitizing errors. Would it be better to use light communication between the chips (optoisolators)? When encased, there would be no risk of interference, slight offsets or changes in separation would not be an issue, and very high frequency signals could be conveyed without any inductance issues.

DougInRB
User Rank
Author
Re: Your take
DougInRB   2/24/2014 2:40:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Hmmm.  It has been many decades since EE school, but if I remember EE101 correctly -  you need a change in current on one side to induce a change in voltage on the other side.  A SERDES is one way of doing this, but since we have been told (in this article and subsequent comments) that it is a simple circuit to do this, I had to dig deeper.

Then I found a paper in ISCC 2009 titled "Wireless DC Voltage Transmission Using Inductive-

Coupling Channel for Highly-Parallel Wafer-Level Testing".

 

This paper explains how it can be done.  The application in this case was for wafer-test, but the principles are the same.

Guess who one of the contributing authors is?

 

Tamza2
User Rank
Author
Re: both wireless and TSV stacks have merits
Tamza2   2/24/2014 1:13:09 PM
NO RATINGS
It is NOT just a matter of silicon cost, but cost at the system level. And even more so, even a 'feasibility' of certain applications. Besides the manufacturing headaches in executing a true 3D structure one is also faced with several others that may be the 'brick wall': yield, thermal, reliability, even FA.

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: Wireless power?
zewde yeraswork   2/24/2014 12:15:04 PM
NO RATINGS
the issue of the quality of the transistor cannot be overstated

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: Wireless power?
zewde yeraswork   2/24/2014 12:12:42 PM
NO RATINGS
There are questions involving the size of coils, aligning coils and eliminating interference between chips that will continue to dog efforts to use wireless chips.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...