Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
resistion
User Rank
Manager
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
resistion   2/27/2014 1:23:09 PM
NO RATINGS
It also depends how you define "7 nm". Although it is supposed to be ~14 nm half-pitch by projection from previous nodes, I can't imagine gates accomodating this, for example. Lg hasn't been scaling that fast recently. It seems more likely to be stuck at say, around 20 nm half-pitch (which requires only double patterning), but there could be more layers patterned this way than previous nodes.

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
zewde yeraswork   2/27/2014 1:04:56 PM
NO RATINGS
That would be quite the irony for EUV to support double patenting. Thanks for the background in distinguishing EUV from DOV, it's pretty helpful insight.

eejack
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Do you still believe in EUV? (question is, do the primes believe?)
eejack   2/27/2014 10:47:09 AM
NO RATINGS
The drive lasers continue to fall short. Maybe they will reach the 43KW (in Cymer's case) needed, but that's just for minimum commercial viability. The current drive laser technology is far from practical as a means to build towards the cited ~1KW EUV needed for full sustainability of EUVL.  Yet the two primary players have both chosen a path of non-interest in a new generation of CO2 laser technology that bypasses the limitations of the current ones. With volumetric extraction about 3 times as high, practically scalable, Helium free with low to no gas usage, coupled with low maintenance requirements and almost unlimited shelf and dynamic lifetime, one would expect such a laser design would be of interest to them. 

If the benefits of a vastly improved drive laser is considered unimportant, one wonders just what plans they have made to mitigate not achieving EUVL as envisioned. Maybe they no longer believe in it and are pursuing tracks of which we are not yet aware.

ScottenJ
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
ScottenJ   2/27/2014 10:09:13 AM
NO RATINGS
Having attended both of the talks referenced in the article I was surprised by the articles optimistic title and tone. I thought the tone of the talks was generally negative. TSMC in particular really called out ASML not only on the source power but the source reliability as well.

I think in general the mood at the conference is skepticism on EUV and a growing confidence that the 14nm, 10nm, 7nm and even 5nm node can be done without it!

Gridded arrays are being adopted by logic greatly simplifying the difficulty of printing patterns.

Self-Aligned Quadruple patterning is being employed today to make cost effective 16nm NAND Flash. The emerging 3D NAND technologies are already producing 1x equivalent class NAND using 50nm lithography.

A number of talks showed novel combinations of multi patterning techniques with shrink technology that could meet logic requirements at least down to the 7nm node.

The next generation of immersion tools currently being introduced is capable of 250 wafers per hour increasing productivity and reducing cost.

Yes the idea of Octuple Patterning with up to 9 cut masks is economically daunting but there are a number of design and process technologies that can likely mitigate a lot of that. Smart designs, shrink techniques, etc. can all reduce the number of cut masks. There is also a lot of work being done on cost reducing multi patterning by simplification and less expensive material and equipment choices.

EUV may still have its day but even without it the industry appears to be positioning itself to move forward.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
CEO
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
wilber_xbox   2/27/2014 7:21:01 AM
NO RATINGS
The problems are not only about lithography but much more for example planarization, multiple masks, metrology etc. What i have seen, the cost will increase exponentially but the ROI will be only additive.

rick merritt
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
rick merritt   2/26/2014 11:07:07 PM
NO RATINGS
If we have to go multipatterning at 7nm--how bad is it? How many times through the litho machine? How much added cost? Ripple effects on chip customers?

rick merritt
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 193i + E-beam?
rick merritt   2/26/2014 11:04:01 PM
NO RATINGS
@Hank: Yes, I interviewed David Lam last year about his e-beam effort at Multibeam.

See: http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1318828

 

resistion
User Rank
Manager
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
resistion   2/26/2014 9:54:19 PM
NO RATINGS
It is interesting to compare the history of DUV and EUV.

DUV resolution was improved first by increasing NA (even to >0.85, before immersion possible), then reducing wavelength (248 nm to 193 nm).

So the EUV community should be focusing on increasing NA and the next EUV wavelength (BEUV or 6.7 nm).

I don't what is the current status at SPIE, but if there is still reluctance or lack of consensus to go to higher NA or BEUV, that's already a sign. Even going to NA>0.4 requires re-consideration of the EUV multilayer design which affects the lithography demagnification and the mask infrastructure.

Then the irony will be that the EUV community could begin to support double patterning, triple patterning, etc. at 13.5 nm. Which defeats the current justification to going to EUV. We might be hearing about this next year, in preparation for 7 nm node.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
CEO
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
wilber_xbox   2/26/2014 1:07:37 PM
NO RATINGS
We should look beyound the lithography tool solutions. We should modify the design rule and make relatively simple chips. I think we have already missed the deadline on 7nm EUV with the current source power.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
CEO
Re: 7nm without EUV
wilber_xbox   2/26/2014 1:04:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick, the only viable option right now is multi-patterning solution. Ofcourse the cost will be very high and the challenges immense but some top level executive would want to make it a marketing sucess.

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

MSGEQ7-Based DIY Audio Spectrum Analyzer: Testing
Max Maxfield
13 comments
In my previous column on this topic, we discussed the step-by-step construction of the first pass at a MSGEQ7-based DIY audio spectrum analyzer for use in my BADASS Display project. Of ...

Karen Field

June 2014 Cartoon Caption Winner
Karen Field
13 comments
Congratulations to "Wnderer" for submitting the winning caption for our June cartoon, after much heated conversation by our judges, given the plethora of great entries.

Jeremy Cook

Inspection Rejection: Why More Is Less in a Vision System
Jeremy Cook
3 comments
Albert Einstein has been quoted as saying, "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler." I would never claim to have his level of insight -- or such an awesome head of ...

Jeremy Cook

Machine Fixes That Made Me Go 'DUH!'
Jeremy Cook
21 comments
As you can see in my bio at the end of this article, I work as a manufacturing engineer. One of my favorite things that happens on a Friday late in the afternoon is to hear my phone ring ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)