Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Mother ship model or non-mother ship model?
junko.yoshida   2/25/2014 9:33:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Jessica, thanks for a well-researched story. 

You quoted Rick Doherty saying:

"The original Galaxy Gear depended almost totally on a mobile phone for its intelligence; sort of a mother ship and motor launch," he said. "The next generation put more intelligence into devices and some may never need to talk to phone."


While I understand what the analyst is saying, I disagree. Everyone already has a smartphone. Why tax your next wearable with redundant functions?

Physiker
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: Mother ship model or non-mother ship model?
Physiker   2/26/2014 8:47:06 AM
This might be a strange thought to many, but not everybody has a smartphone. Or wants to have one...

zeeglen
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Mother ship model or non-mother ship model?
zeeglen   2/26/2014 9:30:46 AM
NO RATINGS
This might be a strange thought to many, but not everybody has a smartphone. Or wants to have one...



Ditto.  The only time I do not have access to a real computer is when I am driving my car.  I have no desire to app and drive at the same time.

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Mother ship model or non-mother ship model?
zewde yeraswork   2/26/2014 9:44:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, but with more complex and advanced devices--both smartphones and wearables--it is true, as the analysts in this story say, that companies will have to invest in more powerful and advanced chips.

JimMcGregor
User Rank
Blogger
The analysts are missing the mark
JimMcGregor   2/26/2014 10:43:14 AM
NO RATINGS
I have to chime in on this one. First, I will agree that a full-version of Android is overkill for wearables unless you want full smartphone features. However, Android is built around a kernel. You do not need to use everything. Second, Tizen will have absolutely no impact on the market unless other OEMs use it as well. I don't see this happening because OEMs don't want to use hardware or software platforms controller by other OEMs. Motorola, Nokia, and Intel all tried this in the past. This might still be a good solution for Samsung, but Samsung will have to do the heavy lifting to port apps over to Tizen or the RTOS. The rest of the industry is more likely to stick with Android if they want that level of functionality. Otherwise, any version of Linux or RTOS will suffice.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
Re: The analysts are missing the mark
wilber_xbox   2/26/2014 12:56:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Also, Samsung is taking strategy decision to not bet on single horse in long run. By developing its own OS, it might be able to put some weightage in mobile software solution. The advantage of TIGEN that caught my attention is the battery life. If samsung would be able to enable longer battery life on wearable devices with software solutions then it will be a big lead over Andriod.

Jessica Lipsky
User Rank
Author
Re: Mother ship model or non-mother ship model?
Jessica Lipsky   2/26/2014 1:22:53 PM
NO RATINGS
I think it's less about redundant function and more about not having to use your smartphone as a hub for uploading and reviewing. With simple OSes like Tizen and RTOS, wearables won't be capable of the exact same functions as a phone anyhow. The question is, do they need that capability or just a powerful processor that's capable of synthesizing information for a small range of applications.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Mother ship model or non-mother ship model?
junko.yoshida   2/26/2014 3:03:08 PM
NO RATINGS
@Jessica, what I meant by "redundant" is about modem. If you already have a phone and that connects to the outside world, why do you add yet another modem to your simple peripheral (aka wearable)?

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
Re: Mother ship model or non-mother ship model?
chanj0   2/26/2014 5:48:23 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree. When you have a powerful machine in your pocket, why don't you utilize it?

On one hand, I think what important is whether option is given to user. If I forget my smartphone, I will still want my wristband to function as a watch, or to collect my activity level until the storage it out.

On the other hands, low power consumption is crucial in any wearable device. if a more powerful processor is used, I'm afraid optimizing runtime becomes a challenge.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Mother ship model or non-mother ship model?
junko.yoshida   2/26/2014 6:24:45 PM
NO RATINGS
@chanj, agreed.

In fact, that's why I am fascinated with MediaTek's wearable SoC. Low power, simple enough, designed to go after less than $50 wearable devices.  

http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1320842

 

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
10 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).