Nokia 220 is an interesting breed. It supports 2 most popular apps for a lot of people. If it supports Whatsapp and/ or other messaging software, it could satisfy a lot of consumers especially in emerging market.
However, a $25 smartphone with Firefox OS is even more attractive. I wonder what's the capability with the specification.
Yes Firefox Spreadtrum is having good interface as compared the Nokia Chromium OS, also the features as compared to the price is the way exceptional WiFi, 2MP Camera and Dual Sim is amazing for the first time smart phone buyers. This phone will really extend the actual reach of internet to many users for whom access to internet is not affordable as on day.
Some people think that the limitation of the Firefox phone is the lack of 3G. But many users only need basic messaging and Facebook, and they will use wi-fi for uploading pictures, watching videos, etc.
:), Nokia might be planning to recompile all their Symbian apps for its new platform. Nokia has ported Android on their 500 and 600 series of windows phones, why they are still experimenting with new platforms?
I think that this will be their least price model of the phone what they are discussing and promoting as on day. But they might surely have a model with 3G connectivity, but the price will not be 25$ for that model.
Also in the developing markets cost of 3G plans is such that 25$ Cell Phone user will not be able to afford data plan of 3G. In that case not having 3G is logically correct.
Then the commitments to those itself is becoming the bottleneck for the survival of Nokia, I do not think that there will be any harm in using the open source flavour of Android, and that if Nokia should have started well in advance it might still be number one position in mobile handset market, as it was in 90s.
@Kinnar, I agree with your opinion that Nokia can regain its number one position if they adopt Android. Even though the Nokia X doesnt run Google Services Nokia says that Nokia X is compatible with 75 percent of all Android apps and 25 percent of the apps needs little retouch.
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.