Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
dgreigml1
User Rank
Author
Re: Nature reverse engineering
dgreigml1   2/28/2014 4:50:09 AM
NO RATINGS
Reincarnation? Mental masturßbastion perhaps? I suppose there may be a turd option.

There again perhaps a 4th, speaking as a Buddhist, messed it up in this life so reincarnation is high on the Natures hand of cards, preferance Snow Tiger, Snow Leopard or Peregrine, Ladakh would be lovely.

ologic
User Rank
Author
Ethically chalenged
ologic   2/28/2014 4:46:08 AM
NO RATINGS
How about filing for a patent on the process of finding a company that protected an invention via trade secret, figuring out what that secret is, patenting it ... and then suing the original company ?

Fiction ? Think again :

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081107/0118162765.shtml

boblespam
User Rank
Author
Nature reverse engineering
boblespam   2/28/2014 2:44:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Theres is also Nature reverse engineering, which is quite fun and with no risk to be considered as illegal or unethical. Anybody here has practical experience in that domain ?

dgreigml1
User Rank
Author
Reverse Persictive
dgreigml1   2/27/2014 10:59:26 PM
NO RATINGS

Okay, this way off whack, but I have always found inspiration from reading maths/physics/chemistry and optics books whilst sat atop the toilet throne.

Born and Wolf, Chapter 1 "Maxwell's Equations" must scare the pants off a fresher but a seasoned electronic engineer can skip that chapter and find a few good bits betwixt the covers.

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: Hmmm
Max The Magnificent   2/27/2014 3:30:28 PM
NO RATINGS
@LB_Engineer: RE is fundamentally about learning.

Now, I can happily agree with the use of RE as a learning tool -- if I take myself away from the semiconductor industry and consider a mechanical contraption, for example, I can well see myself wanting to take it to bits to see how it works.

LB_Engineer
User Rank
Author
Re: Hmmm
LB_Engineer   2/27/2014 3:26:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Max,

"Stealing" someone else's design as you describe it is not RE, it is chip piracy.  Chip piracy was always unethical and it is illegal since 1984.  Second sourcing in pre-1984 style was practiced by the semiconductor companies but its questionable ethics unfairly tainted the entire business of RE.  That is the image I wanted to clear.

 

RE is fundamentally about learning.  I never forget the amount of knowledge I gained by dissecting and Bob Widlars' LM10, in the early 80s.   The knowledge I gained about his new design concepts such as the use of merged PNP/NPN structures, the use of controlled amounts of positive feedback in a real-to-GND output stage and so on, was worth a few semesters of university lectures.  It took me about three weeks to do all that learning.  From there I went on to create my own patented opamp architecture that was much smaller in die area.  That allowed me to place ten opamps on a single chip in 1982.   Granted, no big deal now, but it was much harder to do that in those years.  This is what RE is all about.

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Hmmm
Max The Magnificent   2/27/2014 11:54:30 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
I can certainly see the argument that reverse engineering is appropriate when it comes to checking for IP infringement.

But if someone kills themselves designing anything and someone else comes along and reverse engineers it and then creates and sells copies of it -- I cannot see how that is in any way not considered to be stealing.

On the other hand ... as an end user in the 1980s ... I do remember liking the fact that a lot of the components I used were "second-sourced" -- I just don't recall thinking about what that actually meant.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
db1999
 
betajet
 
elizabethsimon
 
moronda
 
M_Alex_Nugent
 
Clive
 
moronda
 
KarlS01
 
moronda
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...