Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
cookiejar
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
cookiejar   3/8/2014 4:00:09 PM
NO RATINGS
I've been servicing all my cars for the last 50 years.  The OBD have certainly been useful for diagnosing engine sensor/system problems. 

Unfortunately, you have to spend over $3,000, even on third party scanners, to get the useful brake and chassis scanners.  After replacing all the brake lines on a 2006 Buick Lucerne, I discovered that you needed the expensive scan tool in order to bleed the ABS controller.  Fortunately, I had a mechanic friend who dropped by with his and we bled the brakes.  To the average backyard mechanic, this would require a tow, unless you want to drive to your friendly service emporium with no brakes. In my experience, the expensive scanner will also identify an intermittent wheel speed sensor.  It's also necessary to diagnose transmission problems. It will also read your AC pressures among a host of other parameters.

The issue is the old charging what the market will bear.  Let's face it, the added cost of a large enough flash to store all the additional codes wouldn't be more than 10% of the price of the cheap scanners.

Giving access to the car's buses will probably result in many inadvertent code changes, necessitating an expensive trip to the dealer to set things right by changing expensive modules - a great new profit center.

I'll be watching Ford closely to see if they end up with a serious hacking problem.  This is a decision that has the capability of destroying the company.  After all it would be viewed as a challenge to hackers around the world.  Would you continue driving a Ford if suddenly they were going out of control and crashing all around you?

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
zewde yeraswork   3/3/2014 11:02:21 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, the programming information on the Mustang is especially appealing.

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
LarryM99   2/28/2014 12:30:18 PM
NO RATINGS
@peplin, thanks much for the reference! It looks like they are in fact using the OBD interface but are documenting it more fully. I wish I would have had something like this for my Corvette. On that car and on my wife's Chrysler van my scanner only interprets the generic codes. It certainly doesn't provide programming information as does this site for the Mustang.

peplin
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
peplin   2/28/2014 11:07:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Hey Larry, the data available is listed here, through a link in the Ford-specific section: http://openxcplatform.com/hardware/vehicles.html and there is lots of information on the supported hardware interfaces (including open source hardware options): http://openxcplatform.com/vehicle-interface/hardware.html

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
zewde yeraswork   2/28/2014 10:23:40 AM
NO RATINGS
It's definitely a bold move. We'll see if its a smart one, though, as Ford moves in the direction of muscle cars even more decisively than in the past.

chanj0
User Rank
Author
Great Move but...
chanj0   2/28/2014 3:23:07 AM
NO RATINGS
It is a great move but a lot of car lovers are already changing computer data to improve engine power and twist the performance of the car. In addition, if general public can start twisting performance of an engine w/o enough understanding, there might be concern to not only Ford Motor but also to the safety of road users.

 

boblespam
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
boblespam   2/28/2014 2:28:40 AM
NO RATINGS
Great move from Ford. Only an american company could have been the first to do such a change in the global way of thinking. I hope the other car makers will follow. I also hope it will not be limited to the usual ODB Codes that everybody already know. It could be extended to diagnostic control codes, calibration procedures, options/extensions configuration and these stuff that remain closed today.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
junko.yoshida   2/28/2014 1:33:59 AM
NO RATINGS
Bold, indeed. But again, I keep thinking how they get around so-called "security" and "safety" issues of their cars.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
junko.yoshida   2/28/2014 1:31:02 AM
NO RATINGS
@Larry, thank you. It's interesting and 'silly' as you say that they limit the access to code because they want to give an advantage to repair shops. Meanwhile, I thought it was for the sake of 'security' of a car. Have I been misled?

AZskibum
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
AZskibum   2/28/2014 1:04:33 AM
NO RATINGS
It's a pretty bold move, but well in keeping with the tradition of embracing muscle car enthusiasts' "hacks" to OEM designs. Kudos to Ford.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Most Recent Comments
dnadler017
 
realjjj
 
realjjj
 
jimfordbroadcom
 
jimfordbroadcom
 
resistion
 
jimfordbroadcom
 
jimfordbroadcom
 
realjjj
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...