Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
cookiejar
User Rank
CEO
Re: Open XC
cookiejar   3/8/2014 4:00:09 PM
NO RATINGS
I've been servicing all my cars for the last 50 years.  The OBD have certainly been useful for diagnosing engine sensor/system problems. 

Unfortunately, you have to spend over $3,000, even on third party scanners, to get the useful brake and chassis scanners.  After replacing all the brake lines on a 2006 Buick Lucerne, I discovered that you needed the expensive scan tool in order to bleed the ABS controller.  Fortunately, I had a mechanic friend who dropped by with his and we bled the brakes.  To the average backyard mechanic, this would require a tow, unless you want to drive to your friendly service emporium with no brakes. In my experience, the expensive scanner will also identify an intermittent wheel speed sensor.  It's also necessary to diagnose transmission problems. It will also read your AC pressures among a host of other parameters.

The issue is the old charging what the market will bear.  Let's face it, the added cost of a large enough flash to store all the additional codes wouldn't be more than 10% of the price of the cheap scanners.

Giving access to the car's buses will probably result in many inadvertent code changes, necessitating an expensive trip to the dealer to set things right by changing expensive modules - a great new profit center.

I'll be watching Ford closely to see if they end up with a serious hacking problem.  This is a decision that has the capability of destroying the company.  After all it would be viewed as a challenge to hackers around the world.  Would you continue driving a Ford if suddenly they were going out of control and crashing all around you?

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Open XC
zewde yeraswork   3/3/2014 11:02:21 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, the programming information on the Mustang is especially appealing.

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Re: Open XC
LarryM99   2/28/2014 12:30:18 PM
NO RATINGS
@peplin, thanks much for the reference! It looks like they are in fact using the OBD interface but are documenting it more fully. I wish I would have had something like this for my Corvette. On that car and on my wife's Chrysler van my scanner only interprets the generic codes. It certainly doesn't provide programming information as does this site for the Mustang.

peplin
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Open XC
peplin   2/28/2014 11:07:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Hey Larry, the data available is listed here, through a link in the Ford-specific section: http://openxcplatform.com/hardware/vehicles.html and there is lots of information on the supported hardware interfaces (including open source hardware options): http://openxcplatform.com/vehicle-interface/hardware.html

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Open XC
zewde yeraswork   2/28/2014 10:23:40 AM
NO RATINGS
It's definitely a bold move. We'll see if its a smart one, though, as Ford moves in the direction of muscle cars even more decisively than in the past.

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
Great Move but...
chanj0   2/28/2014 3:23:07 AM
NO RATINGS
It is a great move but a lot of car lovers are already changing computer data to improve engine power and twist the performance of the car. In addition, if general public can start twisting performance of an engine w/o enough understanding, there might be concern to not only Ford Motor but also to the safety of road users.

 

boblespam
User Rank
CEO
Re: Open XC
boblespam   2/28/2014 2:28:40 AM
NO RATINGS
Great move from Ford. Only an american company could have been the first to do such a change in the global way of thinking. I hope the other car makers will follow. I also hope it will not be limited to the usual ODB Codes that everybody already know. It could be extended to diagnostic control codes, calibration procedures, options/extensions configuration and these stuff that remain closed today.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Open XC
junko.yoshida   2/28/2014 1:33:59 AM
NO RATINGS
Bold, indeed. But again, I keep thinking how they get around so-called "security" and "safety" issues of their cars.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Open XC
junko.yoshida   2/28/2014 1:31:02 AM
NO RATINGS
@Larry, thank you. It's interesting and 'silly' as you say that they limit the access to code because they want to give an advantage to repair shops. Meanwhile, I thought it was for the sake of 'security' of a car. Have I been misled?

AZskibum
User Rank
CEO
Re: Open XC
AZskibum   2/28/2014 1:04:33 AM
NO RATINGS
It's a pretty bold move, but well in keeping with the tradition of embracing muscle car enthusiasts' "hacks" to OEM designs. Kudos to Ford.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Feast Your Orbs on My Jiggly Exercise Machine
Max Maxfield
46 comments
Last weekend, I was chatting with my mother on the phone. She's all excited that I'm coming over to visit for a week in November. "I'll be seeing you in only seven weeks," she trilled ...

Glen Chenier

Missing Datasheet Details Can Cause Problems
Glen Chenier
3 comments
It is often said that "the devil is in the details." All too often those details are hidden deep within a datasheet, where you can easily overlook them. When a datasheet reference circuit ...

David Blaza

RadioShack: The End Is Nigh!
David Blaza
120 comments
I'm feeling a little nostalgic today as I read about what looks like the imminent demise of RadioShack, at least as we currently know it. An old ubiquitous cartoon image popped into my ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)