Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Open XC
zewde yeraswork   2/27/2014 3:28:42 PM
NO RATINGS
It may not be shocking for Ford to see Open XC alterations to its Mustang line, but it is a new and interesting twist to an old tradition. The Mustang represents the whole history of the Ford company, in its most glamorous and fast-paced light. To bring that together with technology is a powerful thing.

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
LarryM99   2/27/2014 4:58:55 PM
NO RATINGS
I would still bet that there are lawyers at Ford that had to be shouted down or bypassed to get this one out the door. I would be very curious to see a description of the interface and exactly what data can be had from it. It may just be what is already available from the OBD-II interface that is already mandated on vehicles.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
junko.yoshida   2/27/2014 7:54:48 PM
NO RATINGS
@Larry, exactly. The issue is what data can be exactly had from this interface. So...what sort of things are already available as "mandated" as you say form the OBD-II interface today, and what are not?

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
LarryM99   2/27/2014 11:05:02 PM
NO RATINGS
There are a set of generic codes which are published and additional codes that automotive manufacturers have held as proprietary. The proprietary codes are usually available to scanners by or under contract to the manufacturers and very expensive. The scanners that are buyable for reasonable cost at automotive stores have limited or no access to the proprietary codes. In my opinion, this is silly and eliminating that silliness would be a good step towards increased openness. Why is it that way? To give their repair shops an advantage in repair business.

AZskibum
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
AZskibum   2/28/2014 1:04:33 AM
NO RATINGS
It's a pretty bold move, but well in keeping with the tradition of embracing muscle car enthusiasts' "hacks" to OEM designs. Kudos to Ford.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
junko.yoshida   2/28/2014 1:31:02 AM
NO RATINGS
@Larry, thank you. It's interesting and 'silly' as you say that they limit the access to code because they want to give an advantage to repair shops. Meanwhile, I thought it was for the sake of 'security' of a car. Have I been misled?

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
junko.yoshida   2/28/2014 1:33:59 AM
NO RATINGS
Bold, indeed. But again, I keep thinking how they get around so-called "security" and "safety" issues of their cars.

boblespam
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
boblespam   2/28/2014 2:28:40 AM
NO RATINGS
Great move from Ford. Only an american company could have been the first to do such a change in the global way of thinking. I hope the other car makers will follow. I also hope it will not be limited to the usual ODB Codes that everybody already know. It could be extended to diagnostic control codes, calibration procedures, options/extensions configuration and these stuff that remain closed today.

chanj0
User Rank
Author
Great Move but...
chanj0   2/28/2014 3:23:07 AM
NO RATINGS
It is a great move but a lot of car lovers are already changing computer data to improve engine power and twist the performance of the car. In addition, if general public can start twisting performance of an engine w/o enough understanding, there might be concern to not only Ford Motor but also to the safety of road users.

 

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: Open XC
zewde yeraswork   2/28/2014 10:23:40 AM
NO RATINGS
It's definitely a bold move. We'll see if its a smart one, though, as Ford moves in the direction of muscle cars even more decisively than in the past.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...