Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
AZskibum
User Rank
CEO
Re: Intel leading
AZskibum   3/27/2014 4:34:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Nice to hear that reports of the demise of Moore's Law are greatly exaggerated.

Susan Rambo
User Rank
Blogger
Re: "Intel CEO Bob Krzanich"
Susan Rambo   3/26/2014 3:05:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks @horta1212, we corrected the error, which we regret we had not caught in  proofreading process.  Thanks.

horta1212
User Rank
Rookie
"Intel CEO Bob Krzanich"
horta1212   3/26/2014 2:27:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Just a heads up. Intel doesn't have a CEO named Bob. It's Brian.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Krzanich

resistion
User Rank
CEO
What does it prove
resistion   3/25/2014 10:27:30 PM
NO RATINGS
The demo only proves that Intel has a 14 nm process ready. It does not yet convince this process does not suffer significantly from the highlighted cost of increased amount of double patterning. We need the disclosure of how many layers require double patterning for example. It is likely more than for 22 nm. If not much more, then maybe it can be said to be advantageous for Intel.

_hm
User Rank
CEO
Re: Any news from bigger chips?
_hm   3/25/2014 7:00:27 PM
NO RATINGS
@AKHO: Yes, that is correct. It will be nice to see real large scale product in commercial market. This will test the yield and other hidden cost. But Intel should soon bring out some good product.

 

AKH0
User Rank
Freelancer
Any news from bigger chips?
AKH0   3/25/2014 5:03:21 PM
NO RATINGS
My understanding is that SerDes is a tiny <1mm2 circuit (A 4-channel, 28Gb/s at 28nm, was 3.34mm2, see LSI's paper at ISSCC'14). While this is a good demo, it does not say anything about yield and performance of microprocessor chips that are two orders of magnitude larger.

geekmaster
User Rank
CEO
$10 billion to update fabrication facilities below 20nm?
geekmaster   3/25/2014 2:14:05 PM
NO RATINGS
I have not read the McKinsey report but according to this article: dropping below 20nm "requires updates in fabrication facilities that could cost more than $10 billion."  But Intel said once that about 80-90% of 20nm equipment is usable at the 14nm node.  Why is the cost in the McKinsey report so high?

 

 

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
Intel leading
wilber_xbox   3/25/2014 12:20:57 PM
Good to read that Intel is still pushing the boundaries for others to follow. The only concern is Intel's inability to break the ranks of the likes of ARM, Qualcomm etc in mobile and lower power devices. I think that the main reason behind all the problems is Intel's stubborness to share IP/platform with others. Intel must create an ecosystem for others to join and flourish.



Most Recent Comments
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Feast Your Orbs on My Jiggly Exercise Machine
Max Maxfield
48 comments
Last weekend, I was chatting with my mother on the phone. She's all excited that I'm coming over to visit for a week in November. "I'll be seeing you in only seven weeks," she trilled ...

Glen Chenier

Missing Datasheet Details Can Cause Problems
Glen Chenier
3 comments
It is often said that "the devil is in the details." All too often those details are hidden deep within a datasheet, where you can easily overlook them. When a datasheet reference circuit ...

David Blaza

RadioShack: The End Is Nigh!
David Blaza
120 comments
I'm feeling a little nostalgic today as I read about what looks like the imminent demise of RadioShack, at least as we currently know it. An old ubiquitous cartoon image popped into my ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)