Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
resistion
User Rank
Author
Good motivation
resistion   3/28/2014 12:57:31 AM
NO RATINGS
A lot of motivation for SMIC to pull off 28 nm. Big market for a while.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Good motivation
junko.yoshida   3/28/2014 12:59:43 AM
NO RATINGS
@resistion, I think you are right. But for how long?

resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: Good motivation
resistion   3/28/2014 1:13:04 AM
NO RATINGS
28 nm is a great "waiting" node, that's why it will support a big market.

baybal
User Rank
Author
Re: Good motivation
baybal   3/28/2014 1:48:25 AM
NO RATINGS
SMIC market position has definitely improved through post-crisis years. SMIC managed to weather the economic downturn and following waves of bankruptcies by entrenching themselves in stable niche markets (sensors) and generic 180nm+ service, something that TSMC were not interested in.

TSMC, on the other hand, made a possible error by putting all resources into 450mm/<40nm service that, after 5 year of development, has not reached the market. TSMC lost a sizeable portion of mainstream service market exactly because they were going towards <28nm too fast and trying to skip a node.

It was a wise decision on SMIC's part to stop chasing Taiwanese and to seek growth opportunities beyond TSMC dominated niches. While SMIC has no real way to compete with TSMC heads on in the high end VLSI/SoC sector, their current tactic is valid. SMIC is not out of risk zone yet, and they can be in red again the next year.

The competition in between SMIC and TSMC for mid-end sector seem to be already pushing prices and MOQs down. It will be interesting for me to see how much fab capacity SMIC's expansion will open to PRC's application processor market as it is crucial to PRC's domestic fabless brands (and to my income =).

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Good motivation
junko.yoshida   3/28/2014 3:59:36 PM
NO RATINGS
@baybal, it's interesting you say that it is wise for SMIC to stop chasing TSMC...I've heard others say that too. So far, that strategy is definitely working. The issue is what might happen three years from now...

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Good motivation
junko.yoshida   3/28/2014 4:05:33 PM
NO RATINGS
@baybal, you are also right about the strong demand from China's AP processor guys. Some of them are still using 40-nm process, but they are definitely moving toward 28nm. The question is, as you pointed out, SMIC's capacity.

T.Y. says, "With Beijing and Shanghai combined, our 28 nm capacity is 15,000 wafers per month."

Do you think that's enough?

baybal
User Rank
Author
Re: Good motivation
baybal   3/28/2014 8:09:54 PM
NO RATINGS
>@baybal, you are also right about the strong demand from
>China's AP processor guys.  Some of them are still using
>40-nm process, butthey are definitely ;moving toward 28nm.
>The question is, as you pointed out, SMIC's capacity.

>T.Y. says, "With Beijing and Shanghai combined, our 28 nm
>capacity is 15,000wafers per month."

>Do you think that's enough?

The question is not so much about SMIC's 28nm capacity, but about their total capacity that they can market to AP makers, which includes service on few generations old nodes. When bigger AP makers will move towards 28nm, they will free up a lot of capacity on 45nm which will become available to lower tier fabless companies (think Actions/Infotmics/AMLogic/Nufront).

If these second-tierers will no longer need to go across the straight for capacity, they will get a very very significant cost advantage. Most of mainland fabless have no problems lagging few nodes behind the market. For them, going below 65nm does not change a lot as they are constrained by MOQs more than by per chip costs.

>@baybal, it's interesting you say that it is wise for
>SMIC to stop chasing TSMC...I've heard others say
>that too. So far, that strategy is definitely working.
>The issue is what might happen three years from now...

It is unlikely that mainland fabless will need <28nm more than 45nm service in 3 years.

As you probably know, foundries give MOQs for wafers, and not for individual chips. You can make significantly more chips per wafer with 28nm than with 45nm, but you still need to reach the MOQ for wafers which will always be higher for a service on a node with higher market demand.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Good motivation
junko.yoshida   3/29/2014 12:33:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for your thorough, detailed answers. As I go back to my notes, I do see RockChip are moving onto 28-nm for a couple of their quad-core APs and one dual-core AP this year; so is Amlogic. Certainly, MTK is moving to 28 with their quad core. But you are absolutely right. Most of them -- and their flagship chips -- remain at 40nm.

Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) is not something vendors often talk about, but you shed good light on the issue. Thanks!

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Author
14 nm
double-o-nothing   3/28/2014 10:53:43 AM
NO RATINGS
SMIC's next node is 14 nm in 2017 - it could skip all the double patterning nonsense if EUV is actually available at that time.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: 14 nm
junko.yoshida   3/28/2014 3:54:50 PM
NO RATINGS
@double-o-nothing, so, you think SMIC could entirely skip the 20nm process?

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Author
Re: 14 nm
double-o-nothing   3/28/2014 8:58:22 PM
NO RATINGS
They seem in no rush even for 28 but 14 nm is really a node marketing name. They could have called it 20.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: 14 nm
junko.yoshida   3/29/2014 12:37:40 AM
NO RATINGS
@double-o-nothing, yes, you're right...this could be another one of those great examples for the parallel universe. I would have never really give much thoughts to how important 40nm/45nm market is untiil I talked to T.Y.

resistion
User Rank
Author
Qualcomm
resistion   4/4/2014 3:02:30 PM
NO RATINGS
It's probably no secret now that Qualcomm wants to maximize the number of its 28 nm suppliers. SMIC is also being seriously considered.

http://www.ddrtester.com/page/news/shownews.asp?where=2895625&num=16016



Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...