Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
jimfordbroadcom
User Rank
CEO
Theory about tech entrepreneurial success...
jimfordbroadcom   4/25/2014 5:14:56 PM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
My theory is that tech companies started by 2 guys with the same name do well.  I mean, 2 Steves started Apple - phenomenally successful.  2 Henrys started Broadcom, my employer, - greatly successful.  And 2 Bobs started Linear Technology - very successful.  So where's my other Jim?

Seriously, I tried the entrepreneurial thing (not with another Jim, though), but I found it was Business XOR Family.  I met too many divorced entrepreneurs (e.g. Henry Nicholas III), and I chose family over business.

kfield
User Rank
Blogger
Apples not falling far from the tree
kfield   4/22/2014 2:36:53 PM
NO RATINGS
What I think is remarkable here is how closely the billionaires stayed to the first industry that they worked in. The biggest departure was the entrepneur who steered his dad's soap company into an IT company. And for those engineers who didn't inherit their wealth, they put those degrees to good use in the early part of their careers, and then managed to parlay that into much bigger riches.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
Re: One of the traits not listed...
elctrnx_lyf   4/21/2014 12:21:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Few built from the scratch and few built from the inherited business. Definitely inspiring stories for many to earn engineering degrees.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
Cause and Effect
DrQuine   4/18/2014 2:35:22 PM
NO RATINGS
I read an article years ago about the colleges that graduated the greatest entrepreneurs ... and the answer was that "dropout" scored highest. That doesn't, however, mean that we should advise ambitious engineers to dropout to ensure their success. There are plenty of unsuccessful people who didn't graduate from college. The highly driven innovators who already have an idea worked out in their minds (Bill Gates) may be able to succeed without the degree but most people are better off getting an education to enhance their chances for success. The "dropouts" also tend to replace structured learning with self-education.  If you are highly motivated, self-education can be more efficient.

CC VanDorne
User Rank
CEO
Re: Rockafeller versus the Wright brothers
CC VanDorne   4/18/2014 1:42:32 PM
NO RATINGS
I think the difference is that the Wright brothers did not corner their market.  They were the first to prove a concept (that is if you choose to dismiss Gustave Whitehead's claims) and then others jumped on board.  (No pun intended)  So if there is a lesson to be learned here its about the importace of protecting one's own intellectual property.

I beleive that theme is being well discussed in a few other pages of this forum.

DougInRB
User Rank
Manager
One of the traits not listed...
DougInRB   4/17/2014 2:50:54 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems to me that having a degree from Stanford doesn't hurt either.

perl_geek
User Rank
CEO
Wright and wrong
perl_geek   4/16/2014 3:21:32 PM
NO RATINGS
The Wright brothers would probably be classified better as great practical scientists, rather than designers. They figured out what were the essential problems, and solved them with the crudest possible mechanisms. (If you think "crude" is harsh, take a look at the Flyer's motor.  http://wright.nasa.gov/airplane/eng03.html "Agricultural" and "feral" are other plausible  adjectives.)

Once they had shown what was possible, others, including Glenn Curtiss, designed better solutions. Eventually, the Wrights and Curtiss  stopped fighting each other, and merged their corporations.  Look at what Curtiss-Wright builds now: http://www.curtisswright.com/ Not aeroplanes, but circuit boards.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Rockafeller versus the Wright brothers
Duane Benson   4/16/2014 1:15:51 PM
NO RATINGS
One of the issues in the way of the Wright brothers was their secretiveness. After their initial successes, they packed everything up and didn't make another public showing for several years. By that time, others had joined the fray.

Then, much of their energy went into patent litigation (sound familiar to today?) against Glenn Curtis. They also held on to a technology (wing warping) that, given the materials limitations of the day, was not as viable as the alternative (ailerons) developed by others.

They were absolutely brilliant designers. No question about that. Their business sense, however, maybe not so much.

A great engineer that also understands human behavior and business, has a lot of potential for becoming a successful entrepreneur. A good business person can do the same by using (or exploiting) the work of others, despite limited technical knowledge. Sad, but ture.

ljt1
User Rank
Rookie
Rockafeller versus the Wright brothers
ljt1   4/16/2014 12:57:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Rockafeller cornered the market on fossil fuels. He bacame a billionair.

The Wright brothers cornered the market on fixed wing aircrafts. They became????

I believe this tells it all.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
<b><a href=Betajet">

The Circle – The Future's Imperfect in the Present Tense
Betajet
5 comments
The Circle, a satirical, dystopian novel published in 2013 by San Francisco-based writer Dave Eggers, is about a large, very powerful technology company that combines aspects of Google, ...

Max Maxfield

Recommended Reads From the Engineer's Bookshelf
Max Maxfield
27 comments
I'm not sure if I read more than most folks or not, but I do I know that I spend quite a lot of time reading. I hate to be idle, so I always have a book or two somewhere about my person -- ...

Martin Rowe

Make This Engineering Museum a Reality
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
Vincent Valentine is a man on a mission. He wants to make the first house to ever have a telephone into a telephone museum. Without help, it may not happen.

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
16 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...