Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 5   >   >>
me3
User Rank
Rookie
But this is the only bright spot
me3   4/21/2014 1:09:42 PM
NO RATINGS
The goal for small startups should not be to "help chip guys" but to disrupt them. Modern chip food chain is ill suited for innovation. This movement has the potential to kick the door open.

They must do it quickly before the big guys change the patent laws here and weld the door shut for good. Do it while Uncle Sam is still on your side.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Makers and chip guys
junko.yoshida   4/21/2014 1:03:58 PM
NO RATINGS
@Iroee, you wrote:

I also run into a lot of younger less experienced folks that think the only one who makes microcontrollers is Microchip. They invented it right!


I couldn't help but chuckle, but hey, what a great job Microchip has done to convince the younger crowd as though Microchip is the only game in town! Hats off to Microchip.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: money for nothing and the chips for free?
junko.yoshida   4/21/2014 1:00:34 PM
NO RATINGS
@AZskibum, no, i don't think that a chip company would rely "solely" on firmware, drivers, etc. developed by the open source community...but it would help, I imagine, the problem of having to handhold so many potential customers by fielding all the questions.

As somone said, "Friends help friends for free" is what chip companies are dreaming as the purpose of their so-called "community," is it not?

lroee
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Makers and chip guys
lroee   4/21/2014 12:12:11 PM
NO RATINGS

Well I'm glad that someone else feels this way. I constantly find myself trying to explain where the maker stuff fits. I do a lot of contract design for smaller companies and it's not uncommon for the CEO to proclaim that he is going to replace everything with Arduino.

Never mind that 90% of the product is custom power stuff. Typical wishful thinking I suppose.

I also run into a lot of younger less experienced folks that think the only one who makes microcontrollers is Microchip. They invented it right!

I try to explain that they might be better off using a $99 board from Freescale rather than trying to splice all sorts of Arduino stuff together. It falls on def ears. Somehow free source is not as good as open source. C is scary and sketches are not.

On the other hand, it could take days to find that $99 demo board on the Freescale website and even at that it might not be obvious that it is actually what you want. It is also not all that easy to figure out that the free versions of their development tools are hugely productive high quality tools. What a deal!!

I am sure that the same is true for many other vendors. The issue is that for me this particular one is easier than Arduino for virtually everything I do. However it has taken some time to tease that out.

If a manufacturer can gain some visibility outside of the small group that already knows them, so much the better if it's not a huge investment.


cander111
User Rank
Rookie
Off the Island
cander111   4/21/2014 11:53:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Good article. I think there is another angle here.

Back in the 70s, the standard success story was 'management didn't want to take risks on eating their current business, so we struck out on our own with an idea". Not a problem, since HP, DEC, and IBM ruled and the pesky startup types were just a pain in the management's butt anyway. No Prez will loose his job.

In the past few years, the opposite situation has come up. When Intel turned down Apple's request for a processor for iPhone/iPad, the storm cost people their jobs and the company a good chunk of their capitalization. Every BoD now hammers Exec staff on how hip they are to new types of customers. No chip company Prez will survive without a 'maker' story to tell the BOD. "Yes, we are building tools for the guys in dirty Hoodies who hack IoT stuff!" No one on the BoD is asking about ROI questions about the unwashed semi-masses yet. 

It is easy to put a small team in place, give some love to the open source community, and issue a bunch of Press Releases. Not so it you have to go to the BoD and explain why you missed a market. 

Ask former Intel execs.....

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: money for nothing and the chips for free?
rick merritt   4/20/2014 9:54:57 PM
NO RATINGS
@AZskibum: I agree. I see the maker crowd as an extra, a freebie and a Hail Mary pass to those who are in trouble.

betajet
User Rank
CEO
Business Area One
betajet   4/20/2014 9:46:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Here's another factor.  In many large companies, there is Business Area One (IBM terminology), which is the largest money-making part of the company.  For IBM, this used to be mainframes, for Intel it's the x86 line.  Typically, the management of Business Area One calls the shots.  After all, if BA1 fails, the whole company goes under.

In some companies, if you're not in BA1 you're a second-class citizen.  If you're a chip-maker, the silicon guys are BA1.  So software and making evaluation and development boards could easily end up having second-class status and the company will have trouble hiring and retaining good people for those jobs.  In that case, outside software and eval board developers could end up producing far better products than the company itself.  If a chip has exciting capabilities, people in the developer community will get excited and create wonderful software and boards, provided that the chip-maker publishes adequate documentation.  "Of course, the whole point [...] is lost, if you keep it a secretWhy didn't you tell the world, eh?" [Dr. Strangelove (1964)]

betajet
User Rank
CEO
Re: money for nothing and the chips for free?
betajet   4/20/2014 9:31:18 AM
NO RATINGS
ASskibum wrote about: ...software that the company itself cannot support...

As long as the community-developed software uses a standard open-source license, the company can at any time fork the software and support the fork themselves.  If it's a copyleft license like GPL, the company will need to release the improved source code with binaries.  If it's a permissive license, they don't ever have to release source code again.  (At least that's my understanding, IANAL).

The community has done the hard work of exploring what the software should do and figuring out what tricks are needed to get around the quirks of the chip, so those high-risk, high-cost (in terms of programmer time) factors are taken care of.

A great way to bring the software in house is to hire the key community developers, which gets the company immediate expertise and demonstrates that yes, programmers can make real money writing free software.  Plus, if the key developers wrote all the code they can relicense the software to the company on a proprietary basis.

AZskibum
User Rank
CEO
Re: money for nothing and the chips for free?
AZskibum   4/19/2014 9:54:10 PM
NO RATINGS
The maker community's collective efforts to develop firmware, drivers, etc are great, but do you honestly think a chip company would rely solely on that -- software that the company itself cannot support -- as the only means of enabling its reference design?

alex_m1
User Rank
CEO
Re: Makers and chip guys
alex_m1   4/19/2014 2:22:23 PM
NO RATINGS
One interesting place to look at the effect of maker communities on real products is the mbed community: it's relatively old, uses commercial friendly licenses and is relatively easy to transfer to manufacturing. Not sure how to get the data. Maybe asking mbed or arm, the company behind the project, is a good way.

<<   <   Page 3 / 5   >   >>


Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
<b><a href=Betajet">

The Circle – The Future's Imperfect in the Present Tense
Betajet
Post a comment
The Circle, a satirical, dystopian novel published in 2013 by San Francisco-based writer Dave Eggers, is about a large, very powerful technology company that combines aspects of Google, ...

Max Maxfield

Recommended Reads From the Engineer's Bookshelf
Max Maxfield
2 comments
I'm not sure if I read more than most folks or not, but I do I know that I spend quite a lot of time reading. I hate to be idle, so I always have a book or two somewhere about my person -- ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
2 comments
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
15 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...