Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
AZskibum
User Rank
CEO
Re: Bluetooth Smart
AZskibum   5/1/2014 1:17:01 AM
NO RATINGS
DAC the conference and DAC the integrated circuit or IP block should both be pronounced "dack." The meaning will be clear from the context -- "Did you go to that awesome DAC party?" would never be confused with "this DAC doesn't have enough resolution to meet my requirements." :)

Susan Rambo
User Rank
Blogger
Smart
Susan Rambo   4/30/2014 5:17:48 PM
NO RATINGS
A very smart blog you've written here, Junko, but I won't call it Smart Blog (though that might be a good name for a blog about smart stuff, like smartphones, -TVs, -watches).

Jefe
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Bluetooth Smart
Jefe   4/30/2014 3:00:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Where I work we already had trouble to fit Bluetooth messages that include the word Bluetooth in some of our infotainment products, and have used BT to abbreviate Bluetooth (for example BT Device connected) adding Smart would make those phrases even worse to fit! Replace T for S in our BT?  No way!. For those I'd prefer the BLE abbreviation. 

AZskibum
User Rank
CEO
Re: Sounds like a lot of BS
AZskibum   4/30/2014 2:58:50 PM
NO RATINGS
That's a good argument for Bluetooth Dumb, but I think they could've gone with Bluetooth Lean.

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
Re: Sounds like a lot of BS
docdivakar   4/30/2014 2:44:36 PM
NO RATINGS
@Junko: I, for one, believe that BTSmart has a place and can be the energy-efficient alternative to WiFi in some applications -like the example I quoted elsewhere on Vehicular Area Network applications (I hate to use Smart Cars!) where movig vehicles can tag a stationary beacon for traffic management purposes. This can be done efficiently by BTSmart as it can do so with control plane alone whereas WiFi has to do both control and data planes.

MP Divakar

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
Re: Bluetooth Smart
docdivakar   4/30/2014 2:38:08 PM
NO RATINGS
@Frank: I agree with your observations... tacking on an IPv6 stack so Bluetooth can finally establish itself in personal area networks & elsewhere could have been described by other buzzwords by the marketing folks! BluetoothSmart implies the previous incarnations were dumber!

MP Divakar

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
Re: Bluetooth Smart
docdivakar   4/30/2014 2:28:54 PM
NO RATINGS
@betajet: I have come across many that use DAC for design automation conference, particularly those in the EDA companies. I am guilty of doing the same though I am fully aware of the long-held claim to this abbreviation by the digital-to-analog crowd!

MP Divakar

nickhunn0
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Bluetooth Smart
nickhunn0   4/30/2014 12:22:57 AM
NO RATINGS
Don't forget that smart also means hurting.  As in smart metering...

betajet
User Rank
CEO
Re: Bluetooth Smart
betajet   4/29/2014 7:09:12 PM
NO RATINGS
"Smart Phone" should make people think of Maxwell Smart's Shoe Phone, but alas, these young whipper-snappers don't remember the good old days.  You kids get off my lawn!

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Re: Sounds like a lot of BS
Bert22306   4/29/2014 6:28:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Junko, I also get frustrated with marketing speak that I don't understand. In my brief investigation of this Bluetooth Smart, I see mainly three changes:

1. Low power, of course. They do this by not requiring a constant transmission, but rather pulsed.

2. Also low data rate. Apparently, usually no more than 64 Kb/s, and sometimes only bits per day.

3. A single profile. This is very important. In Bluetooth Classic, so-called, any new device that wanted to be connectable via Bluetooth had to have its profile entered into the spec. So that when the device comes online, Bluetooth will recognize it and know what comms it is expecting. If this can always be consistent, you're better off. New devices can be connected immediately.

I'm not sure how #3 will keep from becoming a restriction, eventually, unless what this really means is that the profiles are handled always at the application layer.

I should add, by my understanding of what constitutes "smart" devices, this actually make Bluetooth Smart dumber than the Classic. It's slower and it knows less about the connected devices, than Bluetooth Classic.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

The 10 Commandments of Electronics
Max Maxfield
19 comments
My chum Rick Curl dropped into my office this morning. We had both decided that we desperately needed some face-to-face time to talk about the current Doctor Who (our feelings are mixed at ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).