Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
Allan McAuslin
User Rank
Rookie
Robust, Safe ADAS Systems
Allan McAuslin   5/7/2014 11:31:44 AM
NO RATINGS
As the article points out there are societal, legislative and liability hurdles to overcome. It's difficult for the car makers to predict if and when (and by what measure) they are able to jump over these hurdles. But from the technical implementation perspective there are some known hurdles. Specifically when we talk about ADAS systems taking control of the car dynamics, be it braking, steering, whatever. As the IHS contributor mentioned there are many components inside these ADAS systems: Microprocessors, FPGA's, DSP's, memories and so on. If the ADAS system is to really take control of the car, then the components used in the decision making need to be robust enough to guarantee operation over the life of the car. Similarly there needs to be built in redundancy to ensure that should a component fail, it does so in a safe way (so called graceful degradation of vehicle functionality). The functional safety standard for automotive systems is called ISO26262 and so far not too many ADAS processors are capable of being assesed against this standard. nor are they typically robust enough to guarantee operation over life for an automobile. So the component manufacturers and tier 1 integrators have some work to do in order to deliver truely fail safe systems for semi autonomous cars. I think this is the first challenge facing the industry.

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
Re: Package Delivery
Sheetal.Pandey   5/7/2014 6:20:56 AM
NO RATINGS
It may be slightly early to start using autonomous cars but thats the future going to be. Anything that a we are highly dependant on like our phone, automobile or home its going to be very very smart in future.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Package Delivery
junko.yoshida   5/6/2014 5:58:12 PM
NO RATINGS
@Wnderer, man, I thought drones are bad enough, but now autonomous cars for delivery? I had never thought of it before, but it is possible, isn't it?

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: unwritten rules
junko.yoshida   5/6/2014 5:56:23 PM
NO RATINGS
@betajet, yes, 101 is pretty bad...but then, driving 880 was always my biggest fear when I used to live in the Bay Area. (Of course, that's across the bay from Mountain View). 

But I agree. The ultimate driving test is definitely Boston!

betajet
User Rank
CEO
Re: unwritten rules
betajet   5/6/2014 5:49:09 PM
NO RATINGS
junko.yoshida wrote: ... there are just so many more cities they need to "master"!

Mountain View is a decent place to start, especially at non-rush hour.  But at some point they need to try out the "Bloody Bayshore" AKA US 101.  We'll see if they're able to survive that one any better than the human drivers.

Then the ultimate USA test: Boston :-)

Loser99
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: Package Delivery
Loser99   5/6/2014 5:45:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Great, until it kills somebody because of a .25 cent part.

Wnderer
User Rank
CEO
Package Delivery
Wnderer   5/6/2014 5:32:53 PM
NO RATINGS
The future of autonomous vehicles is package delivery. Think UPS or Pizza Hut. Here's a vehicle with no passengers. Only drives local roads in predefined routes at less than 30 mph. Couple it with a drone to drop the package on your doorstep. The drone only has to carry a small weight a short distance before returning to a charging station on the vehicle. It's a totally automated delivery system.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Define autonomous driving
junko.yoshida   5/6/2014 5:27:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Totatlly, agree, Bert. 

And that's part of the reason why I thought I might as well spell that out in this blog -- although it probably was obvious to many of you...

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: unwritten rules
junko.yoshida   5/6/2014 5:24:34 PM
NO RATINGS
This thread of discussions on unwritten rules actually proves the point why Google is doing driving testing one city at a time. They are now focused on driving Mountain View, Calif., but there are just so many more cities they need to "master"!

Loser99
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: Insurance class action?
Loser99   5/6/2014 5:18:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Toyota couldn't even get a gas pedal right.

Think the other car companies will risk going bankrupt from lawsuits too?

These things are not even proven in snow/ice/white out conditions.

 

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
14 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).