Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
chanj0
User Rank
CEO
Consolidation of Standards
chanj0   5/11/2014 4:32:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Internet, by nature, is a combined effort of a lot of standards and these standards, somehow, get the agreement of a lot of parties. IMHO, IETF has been the primary driving force and the standards are open. Nonetheless, for IoT development, a consortium formed by major makers will definitely help to further define IoT standard for one simple reason. IoT device is supposed to be low power consumption. If it has to supported a wide range of protocols, maintaining low power consumption will definitely become a challenge. In addition, security and privacy  will further complicate the development of IoT devices.

Alan Messer
User Rank
Rookie
Re: More bridges
Alan Messer   5/8/2014 7:36:31 PM
NO RATINGS
There are many protocols at the device level particularly for non-IP devices and only a small handful for IP connected devices. The challenge is bringing these together to match the users' expectation. This is where UPNP+ features come in: standard cloud access/discovery for 'anywhere access' and lightweight bridging to bring those other protocols into one ecosystem.

y_sasaki
User Rank
CEO
Re: More bridges
y_sasaki   5/8/2014 5:03:17 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't think IoT problem is lack of standard, but TOO MANY of standard candidates. It haven't changed ever since no (or too many) "standard" IP discovery protocol. LDAP, SLP, SSDP(HTTP over UDP, used for UPnP), WSDP (another flavor of HTTP over UDP), LLMNR(Multicast DNS from Microsoft), Bonjour(another flavor of Multicast DNS from Apple), broadcast SNMP GET(Used by HP, many network printers are compatible) ... list just goes on. There would be more than a hundred of IP-based discovery protocols including propriatery ones. You can implement one, or some of them, but unfortunatelly, there's not a single standard protocol you can use universally.

Time will tell which one will survive and which one does not. I think several de-facto standards will be used for different applications, just like IP discovery protocol today (UPnP for routers, Bonjour for Apple-related products, SNMP GET for network printers, etc).

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
More bridges
rick merritt   5/8/2014 4:43:49 PM
NO RATINGS
I know the fragmented state of IoT protocols and networks is a big issue. How much will UPnP+ help you? What gaps still need bridging?



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).