Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
chanj0
User Rank
CEO
Consolidation of Standards
chanj0   5/11/2014 4:32:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Internet, by nature, is a combined effort of a lot of standards and these standards, somehow, get the agreement of a lot of parties. IMHO, IETF has been the primary driving force and the standards are open. Nonetheless, for IoT development, a consortium formed by major makers will definitely help to further define IoT standard for one simple reason. IoT device is supposed to be low power consumption. If it has to supported a wide range of protocols, maintaining low power consumption will definitely become a challenge. In addition, security and privacy  will further complicate the development of IoT devices.

Alan Messer
User Rank
Rookie
Re: More bridges
Alan Messer   5/8/2014 7:36:31 PM
NO RATINGS
There are many protocols at the device level particularly for non-IP devices and only a small handful for IP connected devices. The challenge is bringing these together to match the users' expectation. This is where UPNP+ features come in: standard cloud access/discovery for 'anywhere access' and lightweight bridging to bring those other protocols into one ecosystem.

y_sasaki
User Rank
CEO
Re: More bridges
y_sasaki   5/8/2014 5:03:17 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't think IoT problem is lack of standard, but TOO MANY of standard candidates. It haven't changed ever since no (or too many) "standard" IP discovery protocol. LDAP, SLP, SSDP(HTTP over UDP, used for UPnP), WSDP (another flavor of HTTP over UDP), LLMNR(Multicast DNS from Microsoft), Bonjour(another flavor of Multicast DNS from Apple), broadcast SNMP GET(Used by HP, many network printers are compatible) ... list just goes on. There would be more than a hundred of IP-based discovery protocols including propriatery ones. You can implement one, or some of them, but unfortunatelly, there's not a single standard protocol you can use universally.

Time will tell which one will survive and which one does not. I think several de-facto standards will be used for different applications, just like IP discovery protocol today (UPnP for routers, Bonjour for Apple-related products, SNMP GET for network printers, etc).

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
More bridges
rick merritt   5/8/2014 4:43:49 PM
NO RATINGS
I know the fragmented state of IoT protocols and networks is a big issue. How much will UPnP+ help you? What gaps still need bridging?



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

DIY Practical Joke Project Idea
Max Maxfield
1 Comment
I just received a rather interesting email from a member of the EETimes community who prefers to remain anonymous. This message was as follows:

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...