Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
More bridges
rick merritt   5/8/2014 4:43:49 PM
NO RATINGS
I know the fragmented state of IoT protocols and networks is a big issue. How much will UPnP+ help you? What gaps still need bridging?

y_sasaki
User Rank
CEO
Re: More bridges
y_sasaki   5/8/2014 5:03:17 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't think IoT problem is lack of standard, but TOO MANY of standard candidates. It haven't changed ever since no (or too many) "standard" IP discovery protocol. LDAP, SLP, SSDP(HTTP over UDP, used for UPnP), WSDP (another flavor of HTTP over UDP), LLMNR(Multicast DNS from Microsoft), Bonjour(another flavor of Multicast DNS from Apple), broadcast SNMP GET(Used by HP, many network printers are compatible) ... list just goes on. There would be more than a hundred of IP-based discovery protocols including propriatery ones. You can implement one, or some of them, but unfortunatelly, there's not a single standard protocol you can use universally.

Time will tell which one will survive and which one does not. I think several de-facto standards will be used for different applications, just like IP discovery protocol today (UPnP for routers, Bonjour for Apple-related products, SNMP GET for network printers, etc).

Alan Messer
User Rank
Rookie
Re: More bridges
Alan Messer   5/8/2014 7:36:31 PM
NO RATINGS
There are many protocols at the device level particularly for non-IP devices and only a small handful for IP connected devices. The challenge is bringing these together to match the users' expectation. This is where UPNP+ features come in: standard cloud access/discovery for 'anywhere access' and lightweight bridging to bring those other protocols into one ecosystem.

chanj0
User Rank
Manager
Consolidation of Standards
chanj0   5/11/2014 4:32:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Internet, by nature, is a combined effort of a lot of standards and these standards, somehow, get the agreement of a lot of parties. IMHO, IETF has been the primary driving force and the standards are open. Nonetheless, for IoT development, a consortium formed by major makers will definitely help to further define IoT standard for one simple reason. IoT device is supposed to be low power consumption. If it has to supported a wide range of protocols, maintaining low power consumption will definitely become a challenge. In addition, security and privacy  will further complicate the development of IoT devices.



EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Creating a Vetinari Clock Using Antique Analog Meters
Max Maxfield
55 comments
As you may recall, the Mighty Hamster (a.k.a. Mike Field) graced my humble office with a visit a couple of weeks ago. (See All Hail the Mighty Hamster.) While he was here, Hamster noticed ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
11 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
11 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
45 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)