Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
bobdvb
User Rank
Manager
GPIO #fail
bobdvb   5/12/2014 1:16:03 PM
NO RATINGS
It is really quite bad not to stick to the same GPIO pin pitch, the position of other connectors I could forgive but getting the GPIO connector wrong is a real #fail.

I work in consumer electronics and when the RPi was first announced and I told colleagues about it they said "so what? that isn't very difficult to make.", but the product and the price are well positioned, not for consumers but for its target audience of education. It is cheap enough to donate, break, whatever and expensive enough to be useful. At the end of the day it is a good educational tool, the technology in it is nothing special.

betajet
User Rank
CEO
Re: Can we expect Raspberry Pi "C" version sooner?
betajet   5/11/2014 3:20:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Sanjib wrote: With the competition rising, can we expect the next version of Raspberry Pi sooner?

While there are many new boards out there that compete effectively with RasPi on the basis of computing power, I haven't seen one compute with RasPi on price.  Model B is still very attractive at US$35, but don't forget that there's a Model A for US$25 and nobody is coming close to that price with RasPi's computing power.  Model A has 256MB DRAM (like the early Model Bs) and only has a single USB port and no Ethernet.  However, if you're going to be using RasPi in an embedded application that does not need Ethernet or multiple USB ports, you save money as well as power -- the LAN9512 chip uses quite a bit when it's running.  Also, if you are using a USB WiFi dongle instead of wired Ethernet, you probably want an external hub anyway so Model A also wins in that application.

I don't expect to see a new RasPi any time soon.  RasPi's purpose is to be "a GNU/Linux box for US$25" as their early Web site stated.  They want RasPi to be so cheap that a student can buy one (or get one as a gift) and be able to explore without worrying about destroying an expensive piece of equipment.  The reason it's so cheap is that the BCM2835 is a media processor with a fairly weak ARM11 processor.  To replace it with an ARM Cortex-A drives the price way up and you can forget US$25.

Speaking of media processors, one of the most attractive features of RasPi is that it has a very powerful media engine, the VideoCore IV.  This gives you 24 GFLOPS SIMD: a 1980's supercomputer on a chip instead of a room-full of racks.  Broadcom recently published the architecture and instruction set for this, making all sorts of interesting graphical and non-graphical applications possible.

There is actually a new RasPi "Compute Module" coming out this summer.  It's basically the BCM2835 SoC, 512MB PoP SDRAM (same as Modem B) and 4GB eMMC Flash on a SODIMM.  But it's not going to save you any money -- it's reportedly US$30 quantity 100.  I believe the Compute Module is intended for products that are developed using a Model A or Model B and need to be converted to product form as quickly and easily as possible.  The SODIMM takes care of the high-density PCB so that a base board can be an inexpensive PCB.

Sanjib.A
User Rank
CEO
Can we expect Raspberry Pi "C" version sooner?
Sanjib.A   5/11/2014 1:58:56 PM
NO RATINGS

With the competition rising, can we expect the nest version of Raspberry Pi sooner? I am sure all those features mentioned for Banana Pi could be met for the next version of Raspberry Pi. One clear differentiating uniqueness of Raspberry Pi compared to the Banana Pi is the processor & SDRAM PoP package on Raspberry Pi. Would that package still be maintained while providing more processing power & more memory? I guess, the PoP would have some limitations in terms of heat dissipation and that would limit the speed and memory. So, would that architecture change in "C" version?

_hm
User Rank
CEO
Re: And not a penny benefits the Raspberry Pi Foundation
_hm   5/11/2014 9:23:01 AM
NO RATINGS
@Jon: Very good point. The sprit of Raspberry Pi is very unique.

Sanjib.A
User Rank
CEO
Re: And not a penny benefits the Raspberry Pi Foundation
Sanjib.A   5/10/2014 2:42:59 AM
NO RATINGS
If this trend continues and if the new guys are successful, many other Pi's could reach out to the enthusiasts. What is the way Raspberry Pi foundation could protect its IP and would it rather make much sense for Raspberry Pi org to try protecting it's IP where as others are making their little computers open source? I agree that the concept is taken from the popular Raspberry Pi and there should have been a mechanism for the Raspberry Pi to get credit for it by earning some share of profit from Banana Pi.

By the way, I got my Raspberry Pi just last week and loaded RASPBIAN today (joined the party late but hope to catch-up faster :)) ...already started enjoying it!!  

Jon Green
User Rank
Freelancer
And not a penny benefits the Raspberry Pi Foundation
Jon Green   5/9/2014 11:47:43 AM
One of the most important points about Raspberry Pi was that profits on sales went to the Raspberry Pi Foundation, a non-profit promoting teaching of programming in schools.

Yes, this board out-performs RaspPi. This is no big deal, and not difficult to do. But all the profits go to its manufacturer, which has leveraged Raspberry Pi's reputation and technology to produce what in my view is a cynical knock-off. They even named it to imply a relationship with RaspPi - something that would, I believe, have had them in court in the UK for "passing off" on the Raspberry Pi trademark.

Please don't encourage this kind of exploitation. Don't buy it, and please do support the good work of the Raspberry Pi Foundation (with which I have no relationship, by the way) instead.



Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

MSGEQ7-Based DIY Audio Spectrum Analyzer: Testing
Max Maxfield
9 comments
In my previous column on this topic, we discussed the step-by-step construction of the first pass at a MSGEQ7-based DIY audio spectrum analyzer for use in my BADASS Display project. Of ...

Karen Field

June 2014 Cartoon Caption Winner
Karen Field
13 comments
Congratulations to "Wnderer" for submitting the winning caption for our June cartoon, after much heated conversation by our judges, given the plethora of great entries.

Jeremy Cook

Inspection Rejection: Why More Is Less in a Vision System
Jeremy Cook
3 comments
Albert Einstein has been quoted as saying, "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler." I would never claim to have his level of insight -- or such an awesome head of ...

Jeremy Cook

Machine Fixes That Made Me Go 'DUH!'
Jeremy Cook
21 comments
As you can see in my bio at the end of this article, I work as a manufacturing engineer. One of my favorite things that happens on a Friday late in the afternoon is to hear my phone ring ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)