Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
TFCSD
User Rank
CEO
Re: When the teachers get it wrong
TFCSD   5/15/2014 2:14:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Trick question: Ignore "10A" for total current and solve the rest.

TFCSD
User Rank
CEO
It's Never Too Early to Study Engineering
TFCSD   5/15/2014 2:08:48 AM
NO RATINGS
Is not exposing children to engineering bordering on child abuse? I think you should get a parents permission first to be safe. That way if they become engineers later in life, you won't be held responsible.  ;-)

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Re: When the teachers get it wrong
Bert22306   5/13/2014 4:04:31 PM
NO RATINGS
The problem is trivially easy to "solve," or rather to show why the problem statement is incorrect.

You are already given all the currents that matter. The answer is that Ix = -2, to provide that extra 2 amps required to make 12 amps flow down R1.

But there is no voltage or current source in the right mesh, only a resistor. End of story.

antiquus
User Rank
Rookie
Re: When the teachers get it wrong
antiquus   5/13/2014 2:37:56 PM
NO RATINGS
If you think that's bad, google for the new "Common Core" math questions. Some of the answers are based on subjective nuance of how the question is asked.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
When the teachers get it wrong
MeasurementBlues   5/13/2014 1:20:32 PM
NO RATINGS
I posted a blog on EDN about a high-shool physics assignment where the circuit was impossible to solve. 30 comments so far. Remember, if you're logged in here, you're logged in there. Click on the image to see the full article.



MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Making math fun and showing why it's relevant is key
MeasurementBlues   5/13/2014 1:14:58 PM
NO RATINGS
@Bert,

For some, algebra/trig/calculus isn't as hard as geometry because some can handle the equations but have trouble with visualizations and shapes.

 

AlPothoof
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Making math fun and showing why it's relevant is key
AlPothoof   5/13/2014 1:06:31 PM
NO RATINGS
@Bert

It's funny you should mention the transitions between algebra and calculus: when I was in high school algebra, we actually derived calculus.  It wasn't part of the standard curriculum at the time, and I doubt I still have the mimeographed pages (which tells you how long ago it was).

I wouldn't be able to do it again at this point but I always remember it because that was what got me through my first semester of calculus in college.  Without that background, I probably would have failed right then and there.

tomeq
User Rank
Rookie
It's true
tomeq   5/13/2014 4:41:29 AM
NO RATINGS
It's true and more and more companies realize that the lack of engineers can bring them harm in future. During this year's CeBIT in Hannover I talked to Samsung people and they told me that in Korea they have special programming lessons even in Kindergarten. But they realize that at least for now it's impossible in eg Europe, that's why eg in Poland they started at primary school with children at the age of 6-7. Here's the site for it - you can use google translate to get translation from Polish :) http://mistrzowiekodowania.pl/

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Making math fun and showing why it's relevant is key
Bert22306   5/12/2014 5:55:27 PM
NO RATINGS
It's true that many kids, at a very young age, are curious about how things work. I see the biggest problem is keeping that interest alive, while teaching the tools they will need to do wonderful new stuff in the future.

That's a challenge. Among other reasons why, many educators at grade school and high school levels themselves don't know the relevance.

A simple example is the supposed "transition" from arithmetic, to algebra, to calculus. I know a whole lot of people, certainly the vast majority of students, who find these to be traumatic transitions. When in fact, they should be a natural process of generalizing what you had learned before. Those rules you were taught before now become special cases of something more general. Those equations you had to memorize now can be derived, and expanded, from basic and logical principles.

I know I wasn't taught this explicitly, and I'm sure most kids still aren't. I had to figure it out on my own. Kids who see these "transitions" as nuisances in their lives end up dropping out of STEM subjects.

In short, I'd say the problem is not that kids aren't exposed to science and engineering early enough. It's that they are turned off to it, when being taught the tools they need to pursue these interests.



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
6 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).