Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
User Rank
Re: Ah well at least no one died
DrFPGA   5/22/2014 3:28:39 PM
No reports yet doesn't mean no-one died. let's wait and see what the lawyers come up with. Can you spell deep pockets?

User Rank
Re: Ah well at least no one died
jnissen   5/22/2014 3:01:43 PM
I find this hilarious. Google just paid through this nose to get this company and now a basic feature of the device is considered a flaw. When I first read the specs and saw the video on how to use the device I laughed out loud. What would keep it from shutting down when your four year old goes twirling across the floor underneath the device? Bad product design is bad product design. No marketing BS can overcome that. Goggle purchased a big smoking pile of dung. Not the first waste of money for them and surely not the last. I can only hope I'm on the receiving end of their idiotic purchase plans. 

User Rank
Re: Ah well at least no one died
betajet   5/22/2014 2:39:47 PM
AZskibum wrote: The beauty of a connected device...

Yeah, kind of like when Amazon deleted copies of Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four from customers' Kindles in an attempt to win the 2009 Irony of the Year award.

I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder :-)

User Rank
Re: Ah well at least no one died
AZskibum   5/22/2014 12:37:25 PM
The beauty of a connected device is that the problematic feature can be disabled by a remote software update without requiring the user to rip the device off the wall and send it back to the manufacturer.

User Rank
Ah well at least no one died
Crusty1   5/22/2014 12:01:01 PM
@Max this would be good to discuss on Friday? It's almost an issue of augmented reality?

I find this information alarming and amusing at the same time.

I have designed and installed fire detection equipment for a great number of years.

The funny thing is that the detector, to get to market, probably had to pass a whole host of EMC tests.

The alarming thing is where was the safety critical assesment tests for usage?

Just from reading the article, it looks like the software teams got thier silence and isolation issues mixed up.

If I designed a software strategy like this then it would only be a silence option and then only for a limited time interval, such as allowing the detector to clear smoke after burning toast. I do not think I would even do a gesture silence for Carbon Monoxide.


<<   <   Page 3 / 3

Autonomous vehicles on our roads soon? What could go wrong with that? Listen in as EE Times' Junko Yoshida asks industry experts what the intended and unintended consequences will be.
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...