Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: ASSP not Server SoC?
rick merritt   6/3/2014 12:53:10 PM
NO RATINGS
@Tarra! Tarra!  I may not have been clear about this. There are four families of products under the Thunder brand. One is specifically targeted at servers. Others target storage and security appliances and networking.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: 48 core power would be very high
rick merritt   6/3/2014 12:51:24 PM
NO RATINGS
@Servernut: Going back to my notes I see Cavium left itself some quibble room, saying its core "supports optimized OOO."

Re power, as reported they said the products ranges from 20-95W including the Ethernet ports, so well below Xeon.

servernut
User Rank
Author
48 core power would be very high
servernut   6/3/2014 12:13:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick,

Any indication from cavium on what the power of the 48 core device would be? the article mentions the cores as out of order. cavium has so far stayed away with in order simple designs for their cpus.  is that a typo? If the core is out of order, then a 48 core thunder would be over 150W! How will it then compete with intel?

 

 

TarraTarra!
User Rank
Author
ASSP not Server SoC?
TarraTarra!   6/3/2014 11:45:47 AM
NO RATINGS
The interesting thing here is the sheer variety of Thunder options optimized for different workloads. Cavium seems to have pulled this out of their experience with Embedded parts. What I am confused about after reading this is how this will apply to servers.

Datacenter operators buy bulk servers for their fleet. They typically do not know apriori what workloads will run on them. Now they would have to chose the type of server for each workload?? One thing that Intel got right was to simplify the product offerings. Their problem was cost and power.

Cavium seems to be overthinking the problem here? 

<<   <   Page 3 / 3


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Overview: Battle-hardened veterans of the electronics industry have heard of the “connected car” so often that they assume it’s a done deal. But do we really know what it takes to get a car connected and what its future entails? Join EE Times editor Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of movers and shakers in the connected car business. Executives from Cisco, Siemens and NXP will share ideas, plans and hopes for connected cars and their future. After the first 30 minutes of the radio show, our listeners will have the opportunity to ask questions via live online chat.
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...