Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: ASSP not Server SoC?
rick merritt   6/3/2014 12:53:10 PM
NO RATINGS
@Tarra! Tarra!  I may not have been clear about this. There are four families of products under the Thunder brand. One is specifically targeted at servers. Others target storage and security appliances and networking.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: 48 core power would be very high
rick merritt   6/3/2014 12:51:24 PM
NO RATINGS
@Servernut: Going back to my notes I see Cavium left itself some quibble room, saying its core "supports optimized OOO."

Re power, as reported they said the products ranges from 20-95W including the Ethernet ports, so well below Xeon.

servernut
User Rank
Author
48 core power would be very high
servernut   6/3/2014 12:13:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick,

Any indication from cavium on what the power of the 48 core device would be? the article mentions the cores as out of order. cavium has so far stayed away with in order simple designs for their cpus.  is that a typo? If the core is out of order, then a 48 core thunder would be over 150W! How will it then compete with intel?

 

 

TarraTarra!
User Rank
Author
ASSP not Server SoC?
TarraTarra!   6/3/2014 11:45:47 AM
NO RATINGS
The interesting thing here is the sheer variety of Thunder options optimized for different workloads. Cavium seems to have pulled this out of their experience with Embedded parts. What I am confused about after reading this is how this will apply to servers.

Datacenter operators buy bulk servers for their fleet. They typically do not know apriori what workloads will run on them. Now they would have to chose the type of server for each workload?? One thing that Intel got right was to simplify the product offerings. Their problem was cost and power.

Cavium seems to be overthinking the problem here? 

<<   <   Page 3 / 3


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...