Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
DrQuine
User Rank
Author
GM Recall - EETimes Featured on Google News
DrQuine   6/6/2014 5:29:45 PM
NO RATINGS
This news story was one of the featured news reports on the latest Google News highlights.  EETimes is a wonderful channel to communicate technical information to the public. I guess GM is squeezed between a rock and a hard place: "criminal activity" vs. "incompetence and neglect". Neither one of them are good.

John_Galt
User Rank
Author
Consequences
John_Galt   6/6/2014 8:51:07 PM
NO RATINGS
What you are seeing is just one tiny aspect of why GM should have gone through the full bankruptcy process - including breaking it up into smaller units. To paraphrase the oft used political slogan "GM is alive but its customers are dead."

Gadgety
User Rank
Author
Re: GM Recall - EETimes Featured on Google News
Gadgety   6/7/2014 2:45:32 AM
NO RATINGS
I find it interesting that a report at this level blames individuals, and by implication individuals lower down in the organization: "Repeatedly, individuals failed to disclose critical pieces of information that could have changed the lives of those impacted by the faulty ignition switch."

Individuals, repeatedly = corporate culture issue

Responsibility has to rest with the top management and ultimately the board.

Having worked to top management in a lot of corporations, I gather this is the result to push for short term profits over anything else. Wikipedia cites NPR stating "General Motors was aware of this potential problem, and holding meetings about it, as early as 2005, but decided against fixing it because it would take too long and cost too much money." GM are not alone. This happens in a lot of corporations.

Corporate top management, including the past ones, need to stand up and be counted, and ultimately, prosecuted.  They take risks and are paid for it, and there is a downside.

_hm
User Rank
Author
GM is again wrong
_hm   6/7/2014 5:50:22 PM
NO RATINGS
GM is again wrong. Why this charade of punishing few individual, who generally do not have much voice and I guess no power at all?

First, management should take full responcibility of any abnormal things happening and protect these 15 or other individuals. IS not it team work and management at top should take more burden?

Will not like to purchase GM vehicle.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
GM fired 15 individuals
MeasurementBlues   6/8/2014 10:54:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Anytime something like this happens, someone must take the fall. But, do the right people take the fall? Does senior mangement take the fall? Ha!

AZskibum
User Rank
Author
Re: GM fired 15 individuals
AZskibum   6/8/2014 12:24:01 PM
NO RATINGS
The fact that it was known internally as the "ignition switch from hell" suggests that it was not a closely guarded secret that this switch had problems.

zeeglen
User Rank
Author
Re: GM Recall - EETimes Featured on Google News
zeeglen   6/8/2014 2:12:34 PM
NO RATINGS
@gadgetry ...individuals lower down in the organization: "Repeatedly, individuals failed to disclose critical pieces of information that could have changed the lives of those impacted by the faulty ignition switch."


Had these individuals voiced their concerns they might have been branded as "shyte disturbers" and fired that much sooner.


_hm
User Rank
Author
Re: GM Recall - EETimes Featured on Google News
_hm   6/8/2014 2:17:10 PM
NO RATINGS
@Zeeglen: Yes, that is true. What one should do is just send one mild email expressing your concern to next level.

perl_geek
User Rank
Author
Not a good resume item
perl_geek   6/9/2014 4:31:54 PM
NO RATINGS
The individuals involved are going to have a hard time getting new jobs.

Apart from having been publicly named, can you imagine trying to explain the contents of the "reason for leaving your last company" box on the application form? (Assuming you can get anyone to let you that far.)

Anybody who's read "On a Clear Day, You Can See General Motors" is unlikely to have been surprised by the internal failings revealed by the report. The real problem in this case is that government CAFE regulations forced GM to sell cars they couldn't afford to build properly.

 

TFCSD
User Rank
Author
Re: GM Recall - EETimes Featured on Google News
TFCSD   6/9/2014 7:58:58 PM
'Incompetence & Neglect' in GM Recall

@Zeeglen: Agreed. I was recently employed at a company where I was tasked to work on cooling a "production approved" circuit which "worked" under the "right" conditions but had a little problem of SMD resistors falling off when too hot (300F +/- 100F). Yet, when properly cooled, it failed to function because this circuit needed the high resistor heat to cause some of the nearby SMD capacitors to breakdown enough to pass a needed RF signal. So this circuit, after passing an initial burst of RF signals, would not start working again until two or so minutes of resistor heating had passed. The present circuit design had "functioned" for a few years at the site and the only problem needing to be fixed was some SMD resistors falling off too soon before the calculated MTBF. I found a simple solution and showed some lower "powers that be". By adding a 1/16 watt pigtail resistor to the circuit, a multitude of RF sins were corrected and this quick fix would allow the additional cooling of the circuit to do its work without causing any RF dropouts. Being new to the company, I did not realize the major faux pas I had made just by insinuating that there may be a design problem with a production circuit that successfully passed through several layers of engineers and all the hoops, loops, tests, and endless meetings of the company's perfect lock step design process that prevented all mistakes (oh the audacity, what impudence I showed). Later I was told by some fellow workers and lower management that finding this new problem would likely cause a Government examination, document changes, board redesigns, board swap outs, retesting, and the Government would not look too kindly on this new costly problem (I "created") popping up during the company's upcoming contract review (oddly, the Gov. waved those tedious heat/power tests). Over the next few months I had the feeling of being a dead man walking and all the air being sucked out of the room. Certain upper/mid management and engineers now would not speak to me as before or acknowledge my presence as they would with others new hires and I was relegated to correcting documents in my small room. A fellow new hire admitted later that he had the heads up for weeks from management that I was not going to have my contract renewed. I had just finished training this "problem safe" shot gunning/board swapper how to fix the same circuit to the component level since I was supposedly being moved to "a new project" (later not funded) and needed to hand off all my current projects. Strangely, many of the original engineers of this wonderful circuit had either bailed to other projects or other companies just before I came on board. Sorry, but I digress, wasn't the question why do lower employees self-censor and why are problems not reported up the chain for management to correct?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
In conjunction with unveiling of EE Times’ Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. One of Silicon Valley's great contributions to the world has been the demonstration of how the application of entrepreneurship and venture capital to electronics and semiconductor hardware can create wealth with developments in semiconductors, displays, design automation, MEMS and across the breadth of hardware developments. But in recent years concerns have been raised that traditional venture capital has turned its back on hardware-related startups in favor of software and Internet applications and services. Panelists from incubators join Peter Clarke in debate.
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.