Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Anand.Yaligar
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Benefits of blog discussions
Anand.Yaligar   6/30/2014 2:28:50 AM
NO RATINGS
Buying a battery to drive 1,000 miles isn't quite so tempting.

@DrQuine, I agree with you. cost will play a major role in whether people will adopt this technology or not. If the cost of driving 1000 miles is significantly less then people will adopt this technology.


DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
Benefits of blog discussions
DrQuine   6/28/2014 2:23:05 PM
NO RATINGS
The discussion associated with this article is a wonderful demonstration of the benefits of blog discussions. While the headline promised a new paradigm in electric vehicles, the discussion revealed that the aluminum-air battery is not rechargeable, self discharges, and has an unknown cost. Buying a battery to drive 1,000 miles isn't quite so tempting.

Randall1
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Cost?
Randall1   6/23/2014 5:27:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Might be worth pointing out that the entire battery does not have to be replaced; only the aluminum anodes and wherever the spent aluminum oxide is stored.

So, at least potentially, this could be an operation not that different from buying a tank of gas "back when".  Pull into an equipped service station, the attendant removes the spent anode pack and AlOH3 receptacle (with the help of a purpose-made crane), and replaces them with fresh ones.  The removed components get recycled (with the addition of electricity) and used in the next car.

Definitely a different paradigm (are we still allowed to use that word?) but potentially workable I think.

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
CEO
Cost?
prabhakar_deosthali   6/14/2014 4:02:14 AM
NO RATINGS
If this Aluminium-air battery is not rechargeable then it is like "use and throw " dry cells kind. 

And at what cost that 1000 mile drive will cost me with this battery?

chrisnfolsom
User Rank
Manager
Re: Why second Lithium ion battery?
chrisnfolsom   6/13/2014 6:35:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Another interesting Aluminum power option for generating Hydrogen although not sure about energy density... http://phys.org/news98556080.html

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Every new article tells me fuel cells are a better idea
Bert22306   6/13/2014 6:33:56 PM
This one sentence SHOULD have been quoted at the beginning of the article, just to negate the hype-effect of the title:

Aluminum-air also differs from lithium-ion in that it is not rechargeable.

Another problem is that the battery continues to degrade when not in use, unless the electrolyte is removed when the battery is to be idle. Minor little details.

chrisnfolsom
User Rank
Manager
Re: Why second Lithium ion battery?
chrisnfolsom   6/13/2014 5:56:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, I would have enjoyed a bit more specific information regarding the Aluminum-Air battery especially in comparison to lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4).  It seems the Al/air batteries have quite a bit more density from the 300wh/kg in the article to 1000wh/kg and potentially 2000wh/kg vs the 90-110wh/kg for Lithium...

Although the difficulty seems to be in the oxidation of the Aluminum as the Aluminum and electrolyte will react once together so when you start a cell, or cells you will start the oxidation process.  There is also some efficiency issues (aluminum degrades to a gel) which it seems they have dealt with already.

I wonder how much engery it takes to reprocess the product of the reaction - thinking about the life cycle of this becoming a common process.  I tried to look at how much energy it takes to make alumnum and could not find it, but even after the energy to mine and process the raw material (bauxite) into alumina - significant - they say that in the U.S. alone uses up to 1% of our power to separate the Aluminum from the alumina - 5.25v @ 100K to 150K Amps btw...

jnissen
User Rank
Manager
Re: Aluminum-air battery not rechargeable
jnissen   6/13/2014 12:10:55 PM
Exactly! Why use a one time use only battery. This is pure marketing gold for the company but absolute bull shi* for being a practical solution in an EV. Supercaps have more legs then this does. At least with that you can recharge nearly forever. The newer carbon-fibre-graphene matrix supercaps piotentially could offset the lithium type batteries. The old EESTOR ceramic caps touted a few years ago were nothing but marketing and miscalculations.

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
CEO
Why second Lithium ion battery?
prabhakar_deosthali   6/13/2014 2:47:23 AM
NO RATINGS
For long range driving this looks to be a good battery to have on an EV.  As I understand , there is no recharging time lost, what you need it is topping up the battery with water at regualar intervals during the journey.

 

I could not understand then why a second Lithium IOn battery is required ?

 

Why can't the same Aluminium -air battery be used for shorter travel distances? Is the Aluminium- air reaction not stoppable in between ? Can somebody elaborate on this technology?

 

Susan Rambo
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Aluminum-air battery not rechargeable
Susan Rambo   6/12/2014 4:52:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi Betajet, Good point. What if you put the extra-range battery in the car only when you knew you needed it, like putting on snow tires, as long as it (the battery) were foolproof to install.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Curiosity Killed the Cat (Just Call Me Mr. Curiosity)
Max Maxfield
19 comments
My wife, Gina The Gorgeous, loves animals. She has two stupid dogs and two stupid cats. How stupid are they? Well, allow me to show you this video of the dogs that I made a couple of years ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).