Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Kevin Neilson
User Rank
Author
Octave is Great
Kevin Neilson   6/21/2014 7:42:23 PM
NO RATINGS
I've been using Octave for Galois Field arithmetic and I'm really happy with it.  For some reason the script I wrote most recently takes 1/20th (!) as long to run on Octave than on Matlab.  (It operates on BCH codes.)  (I'm using Octave on the Mac.) 

-Kevin Neilson

mithrandir
User Rank
Author
Python works too!
mithrandir   6/21/2014 9:55:21 PM
NO RATINGS
I transitioned from Excel to Python for running basic calculations and simulations a few months back. And it works great! Tons of great modules(matplotlib and numpy are a must) and more than anything its fast as hell. And by fast I mean 50 million points in a few secs and it can plot them without stuttering too!

True, it's not exactly a simulation tool, you've got to spend a little time thinking about how to run the simulation but once thats out of the way, it's all smooth sailing.

PS: I used PSoC Creator before and the line "which allows users to design their own Programmable System on a Chip and have it manufactured (that part costs)" is misleading. You can buy a generic PSoC 3/4/5 and program it with Creator i.e., it's all firmware(although that term actually encompasses a lot more when looking a PSoC) and no custom manufacturing is involved. The cool thing is you can always move stuff around and reprogram so it's pretty much like a custom SoC.  

 

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
Re: Python works too!
Sheetal.Pandey   6/23/2014 2:54:23 AM
NO RATINGS
An alternative like this for excel is very good for the engineers. I always felt that engineers need more and should be able to upgrade it themsleves without calling any customer support or getting into copyright issues. I started using Ubuntu and in last three years it never crashed and so easy to operate and has so much flexibility.

pschirrer
User Rank
Author
Another great mathematical tool : Scilabs
pschirrer   6/23/2014 11:46:16 AM
NO RATINGS
I have used SciLabs with much success to do some mathematical work (it is a nice alternative to Mathlab) : http://www.scilab.org/en check it out.

 

Regards

Tonkabot
User Rank
Author
LT Spice IV should be listed
Tonkabot   6/23/2014 11:53:45 AM
NO RATINGS
Best free spice out there, I am surprised it was missed in this list.

 

I went to iCircuit , and it wants 4.99 for the android app, so it is not free.  Maybe there is a limited version for free.

Hoyt_Stearns
User Rank
Author
Pari/GP; other apps; Question
Hoyt_Stearns   6/23/2014 12:06:44 PM
NO RATINGS
You could add PARI/GP from France for advanced algebraic analyses, it's actively maintained, and also goes well beyond what I understand.

I have a question, though:  in 2000, I was using a program that could fit a dataset to a function optimally ( least-squares, outlier reject etc.) by trying hundreds of algorithms, e.g. series, logs, ratios, trancentals, relations among them.  Do you know the name of that program?

 

Howman
User Rank
Author
No LTspice???
Howman   6/23/2014 12:17:23 PM
NO RATINGS
While there are some great tools in this and the original list, I am left scratching my head as to why LTspice failed to make the list again.  I use it very often and is at the top of my list of free tools.

Another nice tool is the free version of Mathcad.  When you let the free 30 day trial lapse.  You get a very stripped down version that is still quite useful as a math scratchpad that handles units.  Very useful for free.

Finally, if you are going to included tools tied to vendor's parts like Cypress' PSoC Creator and TI's WEBENCH, you should included the free versions of Quartus from Altera and ISE WebPack from Xilinx.

DaveMcGuire
User Rank
Author
don't pigeonhole R
DaveMcGuire   6/23/2014 3:08:50 PM
NO RATINGS
It's a bit iffy to classify R as "an alternative to Excel".  R is not a spreadsheet, it never has been and never will be...and Excel has nowhere near the data manipulation capabilities of R.  There is very little overlap between their capabilities.

As a design engineer, I find Excel useful about once every three to four years, usually for things like BOMs, but I use R almost daily for REAL engineering work.  R makes short work of anything that my trusty HP calculator can't easily handle.  It was designed for statistical work (it traces its roots back to Bell Labs'  'S" language in the 1970s, and has seen a great deal of refinement over the years, but it's more properly presented (in my opinion) as a "mathematical Swiss Army knife".

                    -Dave McGuire

 

antedeluvian
User Rank
Author
Re: don't pigeonhole R
antedeluvian   6/23/2014 3:31:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Dave

I know there are many engineers who share your view on Excel. However I have made a bit of a career about writing about the use of Excel in Electronic Engineering.

If you prepared to enetertain the idea that Excel can be used for more than just part lists you may want to work through my blogs on the subject in Planet Analog (http://www.planetanalog.com/archives.asp?section_id=3140).

Wnderer
User Rank
Author
Re: don't pigeonhole R
Wnderer   6/23/2014 3:43:44 PM
NO RATINGS
I use Excel for analysis all the time. If you are looking for an alternative to Excel, you might want to check out pyspread.

http://manns.github.io/pyspread/


I haven't tried it, because the team uses Excel and I'm not going to switch to something different, but I like the idea of using Python to program a spreadsheet rather than Vbasic.

Page 1 / 4   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...