Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: SN7400N in stock at Digi-Key
Duane Benson   6/27/2014 2:44:27 AM
NO RATINGS
I still have a few 7400 series chips that I bought in the late 70's or early 80's in my parts bins

John Birkner
User Rank
Rookie
Re: The Soul of A New Machine
John Birkner   6/27/2014 1:57:31 AM
NO RATINGS
I remember that it was Data General using PALs in the MV8000 to replace TTL.

Kevin Neilson
User Rank
Manager
Re: The Soul of A New Machine
Kevin Neilson   6/27/2014 1:37:31 AM
NO RATINGS
"Ah, the memories," says Doug.  Pun intended?

Kevin Neilson
User Rank
Manager
Re: Unequal output source/sink
Kevin Neilson   6/27/2014 1:36:24 AM
NO RATINGS
A lot of engineers still use active-low signals in HDL, which drives me nuts.  It just adds confusion, and isn't really helpful unless you accidently time-warp back to 1982.  Then when they OR them together they'll DeMorganize which makes everything more confusing:

if ~(rst_a & rst_b & rst_c) ...

Homer J Simpson
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Unequal output source/sink
Homer J Simpson   6/27/2014 1:27:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Those would be Schottky diodes, not zeners. Probably the Low-power Schottky 74LS series TTL - my personal favorite because that's what I grew up with. Oh boy, where did the last 30 years go?!

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
Re: SN7400N in stock at Digi-Key
David Ashton   6/26/2014 9:56:37 PM
NO RATINGS
You still see 7406s - hex inverters - used as drivers.  Open collector with Vce = 30V and Isink = 40 MA.  But most people now would use the ULN2003 or similar.  Even better specs.

traneus
User Rank
Rookie
SN7400N in stock at Digi-Key
traneus   6/26/2014 9:26:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Digi-Key does stock Texas Instruments SN7400N quad NAND gates (p/n 296-14641-5-ND, $1.64 for one piece) and a few other parts in the original series.

DougInRB
User Rank
Manager
Re: The Soul of A New Machine
DougInRB   6/26/2014 4:23:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Ahhh the memories....  That was required reading in one of my EE classes at Cal Poly (mid '80s)  I had never dreamed there would be so much intrigue and espionage in the design of a computer.  I recall that GI was one of the first to utilize PALs.

 

TanjB
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Unequal output source/sink
TanjB   6/26/2014 11:59:24 AM
NO RATINGS
I believe the origin of the asymmetry traces back to relay logic.  Relays were either on or off (subtly different from high or low) and that conditioned the way of thinking about logic.  It suited bipolar transistors very well, especially since they could only make NPN on the chip in the early days (to do both would add process steps).  Well, they could have made a chip with all PNP but that performed worse then as they still do today, so TTL was all NPN and engineers could happily continue in the mindset of a "1" being switch on, pull down.  There was not much concern about capacitance so pull-up current could be low.  External wires themselves became extra logic (a bus line served as a "wired NAND" when it had a pull-up resistor).

CMOS was exotic technology requiring the chip to go through extra process steps.  The first forms which came out in the early 70s were aimed at low power and almost seemed like magic (they ran on less than a micro-amp!).  But even these, initially, had the same asymmetric ability to sink 20mA (a standard which went back to teletypes and relays) with very little pull-up (which was fortunate since the PMOS transistors, like PNP, were lower performance than NMOS).  It was not until the late 80s when CMOS was pervasive and wired-NAND style busses finally died in pursuit of higher frequency / lower power operation that CMOS outputs became routinely symmetric and the idea of pull down faded entirely.

I'm pretty sure that version with zener diodes must have been a very late iteration of TTL.  I recall zeners being a novelty in the early 70s as discretes, and it probably added complexity for them to learn to make them on the same chip as the transistors.

zeeglen
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Unequal output source/sink
zeeglen   6/26/2014 11:51:05 AM
NO RATINGS
FINALLY an explanation of why active-low switches and LEDs were preferred.

Can still remember my first time with CMOS and how it was so nice to have the choice of LED drive.

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Are Today's Designs Bound by the Constraints of Yesteryear?
Max Maxfield
25 comments
As part of my ongoing Pedagogical and Phantasmagorical Inamorata Prognostication Engine project (try saying that 10 times quickly), I'm working with Jason Dueck from Instrument Meter ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...