Breaking News
Comments
RichQ
User Rank
CEO
Chat on standards
RichQ   6/26/2014 8:32:21 PM
NO RATINGS
There's a live chat on standards taking place at IoT World. Here's the link if you want to join in: http://www.iotworld.com/messages.asp?piddl_msgthreadid=18015

The chat starts at 11am Eastern Time Friday 6/27 and will run about an hour. If you miss it, you can still find the archive of the chat using the same link.

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
Re: Too Many IoT Standards, or Too Few?
docdivakar   6/27/2014 6:32:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Add TIA to the list as well... I hope IEEE leads the way!

MP Divakar

RichQ
User Rank
CEO
Re: Too Many IoT Standards, or Too Few?
RichQ   6/27/2014 7:08:16 PM
NO RATINGS
I assume you are referring to the Telecommunications Industry Association? Here's the link to them: http://www.tiaonline.org/

They do have a new standard out: TIA-4940 (new)Smart Device Communications (M2M) Reference Architecture but you have to buy it to see it and so I don't know its scope or content.

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
Re: Too Many IoT Standards, or Too Few?
docdivakar   6/27/2014 9:36:46 PM
NO RATINGS
You may want to catchup on the activities of TIA's TR-50 committee here:

http://www.tiaonline.org/all-standards/committees/tr-50

I used to attend the conf calls in 2011 but have not participated in last the two years.

MP Divakar

chanj0
User Rank
Manager
Standard vs Proprietry
chanj0   6/28/2014 12:54:01 PM
NO RATINGS
A standard communication protocol will definitely enable better competitive market and will ultimately help advancing the technology. However, a standard could introduce security issue. I'm sure all these organizations have put in a reference architecture with security in mind. Question is whether there can be a better collaboration between different standard bodies so that there are at least a standard for communication between clusters following different standards.

RichQ
User Rank
CEO
Re: Standard vs Proprietry
RichQ   6/30/2014 10:28:22 AM
NO RATINGS
The trouble with having a single standard communications protocol is that it may be too complex for some applications and perhaps not capable enough for others. I have difficulty with the idea that my IoT thermometer reading outside temperature every few minutes will use the same protocol as the IoT devices monitoring the real-time performance of a jet engine. My expectation is that different application domains will choose their own sets of standards to use. I agree that security needs to be a key part of any reference architecture, though.

chanj0
User Rank
Manager
Re: Standard vs Proprietry
chanj0   6/30/2014 12:34:46 PM
NO RATINGS
Absolutely. I don't think it is a good idea to run full-blown TCP/IP stack on IoT devices. There are at least 2 reasons. Firstly, the footprint may not fit well. By increasing memory size, the power consumption becomes a challenge. Secondly, the longer the packet, the higher the power consumption on transmit.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
Government is needed here
KB3001   6/30/2014 5:44:43 AM
NO RATINGS
I think Government need to intervene to push for one set of standards, otherwise the fragmented nature of the IoT will continue and there won't be enough money for companies to be made.

RichQ
User Rank
CEO
Re: Government is needed here
RichQ   6/30/2014 10:32:18 AM
NO RATINGS
There might be a role for government in standards that affect public safety, but I don'tthink that governments need to (or should) be involved in most commercial applications of the IoT. The people working in the field have a much better handle on the needs and challenges than anyone in government. And I trust market forces to work out a standard eventually.

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
Re: Government is needed here
docdivakar   6/30/2014 1:13:16 PM
NO RATINGS
@RichQ  precisely! There was an active participation by NIST folks in TIA-TR50 committee as NIST was also involved in Smart Grid Interoperability Standards. NIST in my opinion is atypical of other goverment bodies that meddle in regulations!

MP Divakar



EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Aging Brass: Cow Poop vs. Horse Doo-Doo
Max Maxfield
33 comments
As you may recall, one of the things I want to do with the brass panels I'm using in my Inamorata Prognostication Engine is to make them look really old. Since everything is being mounted ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
11 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
11 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
45 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)