Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
Re: What a crappy exit for Tilera
fergie1965   7/5/2014 11:50:51 AM
@gsmd, thanks for the ARM shout out!. Given Tilera's approach of aggregating ALOT of modest level performance CPUs the A53 would probably represent a better approach.

I think this is a great purchase for EZChip, especially at that pricing level. Their use of a proprietary processor architecture forced a path for developing turnkey solutions. In that regard, Tilera does have some design wins at a number very significant customers including communications and embedded. The technology is very credible technically. The combination of Tilera's interconnect EZchip's NPUs throws up some interesting possibilities for next generation products.

Tilera lured Andrew Rava (ex Cavium VP sales) out of retirement, appearing this year on the Tilera management page. The purchase by EZChip may, therefore, represent a very recent change of company strategy.

As a hardware guy, it is disappointing to see an exit like this. It is hard for hardware oriented start-ups to raise VC money and this type of transaction doesn't help change that situation. This industry, particularly in the US, has thrived on hardware innovation initiated in small companies and I worry about the "so whats" in the long term.

User Rank
Re: What a crappy exit for Tilera
_d   7/4/2014 6:05:03 PM
Product wasn't bad, but it didn't get traction against Broadcom (XLR/XLP/XLP2) or Cavium (Octeon1/2/3).

Some of that might have been that their mesh architecture meant it was substantially more difficult to use in a packet-processing context: Octeon and XLP had no issues with thread/core placement; for TileGX getting decent latency was hamstrung by the I/O sub-system to start, and then you had to consider the routing latency across the mesh when positioning threads.

Their "developer friendliness" was also perhaps an issue.  They did the right thing in making the basic Linux and compiler ports open, but their eval systems were expensive and hard to get. The advantages of their Zero-Overhead Linux were whittled away by recent advances in the stock kernel too.

Still, they've haven't had a lot of runway with the Gx chips.  With the life-extension from EZchip, they might start to see more success, even if that doesn't benefit the original investors and shareholders.  If they follow the herd down the low-power datacenter path, their architecture might scale better to higher core-counts than their competitors, particularly if they start putting some I/O into the middle of the mesh.  They might need to switch out the instruction set though ... (sigh)

User Rank
Re: What a crappy exit for Tilera
DrFPGA   7/3/2014 11:20:07 PM
Start-ups trying to get into markets dominated by a few big guys is always a problem...

If you don't have a game changer that customers MUST HAVE you lose.

User Rank
Re: What a crappy exit for Tilera
hzrabbie1   7/2/2014 12:39:06 PM
>>>> Any significant design wins?

Their highest volume design win is the Mikrotik Cloud Core Router, which is available with the 16, 36 and soon 72-core TILE-Gx processors.  It's available on Amazon starting at $600.

User Rank
Re: What a crappy exit for Tilera
casual3   7/2/2014 8:47:05 AM
Based on public info, Tilera raised $109M in 4 rounds.

rick merritt
User Rank
Re: What a crappy exit for Tilera
rick merritt   7/2/2014 3:31:11 AM
Good report, Junko!

Anyone know how much was invested in Tilera?

Any significant design wins?

I know they were angling for big data center servers for awhile, but when the ARM server push started they went off my radar screen.

Indeed CPU architectures are like comets -- they explode or fade out.


User Rank
What a crappy exit for Tilera
moronda   7/1/2014 11:23:05 PM
Poor Tilera, what a sucky exit. Only 50 million guaranteed, wow. They must be circling the toilet bowl. How much was invested in Tilera? 150 Million?

The employees must really be happy to get zero after years of working their ass off.

Let me guess, Tilera was running around Sand Hill looking for their F round of funding. All of the investors told them to go pound sand.

EZ chip comes in at fire sale pricing. 

Semiconductors have such crappy return on investment. To me it means the product sucked and was not gaining big market traction. Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...