Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: Why include transistors?
resistion   7/8/2014 6:40:01 PM
NO RATINGS
The sign of applied compliance is the abrupt current jump in SET discontinuous with dI/dV afterward

EE_engineer
User Rank
Author
Re: Why include transistors?
EE_engineer   7/8/2014 1:33:57 PM
NO RATINGS
to resistion -  it seems that they are using a passive crosspoint structure ("transistor-less" crossbar array) considering the core memory circuit pic shown above.

I guess they are refering to mux/demux transistors outside of the passive crosspoint memory structure (a circuit designer's point of view).

 

EE_engineer
User Rank
Author
Re: Why include transistors?
EE_engineer   7/8/2014 1:26:58 PM
NO RATINGS
to resistion - I am not sure about that. Looks like current still increases as voltage increases after the programming. And the device seems to be programmed w/o external current compliance, which is good.

resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: HSR too close to cliff
resistion   7/4/2014 7:23:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Their selector is or closely resembles the threshold switching device like the ovonic type.

resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: Why include transistors?
resistion   7/2/2014 7:53:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Ah, I see the I-V indicates no self-compliance. That makes it transistor-bound. It's a waste of the built-in HSR.

resistion
User Rank
Author
Why include transistors?
resistion   7/2/2014 12:41:19 AM
NO RATINGS
I had thought Crossbar utilized transistor-less "crossbar" arrays. Adding the transistor only worsens the density, compared to without.

resistion
User Rank
Author
HSR too close to cliff
resistion   7/2/2014 12:31:02 AM
NO RATINGS
That HSR definition looks too close to the cliff!



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...