Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: Why include transistors?
resistion   7/8/2014 6:40:01 PM
NO RATINGS
The sign of applied compliance is the abrupt current jump in SET discontinuous with dI/dV afterward

EE_engineer
User Rank
Author
Re: Why include transistors?
EE_engineer   7/8/2014 1:33:57 PM
NO RATINGS
to resistion -  it seems that they are using a passive crosspoint structure ("transistor-less" crossbar array) considering the core memory circuit pic shown above.

I guess they are refering to mux/demux transistors outside of the passive crosspoint memory structure (a circuit designer's point of view).

 

EE_engineer
User Rank
Author
Re: Why include transistors?
EE_engineer   7/8/2014 1:26:58 PM
NO RATINGS
to resistion - I am not sure about that. Looks like current still increases as voltage increases after the programming. And the device seems to be programmed w/o external current compliance, which is good.

resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: HSR too close to cliff
resistion   7/4/2014 7:23:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Their selector is or closely resembles the threshold switching device like the ovonic type.

resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: Why include transistors?
resistion   7/2/2014 7:53:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Ah, I see the I-V indicates no self-compliance. That makes it transistor-bound. It's a waste of the built-in HSR.

resistion
User Rank
Author
Why include transistors?
resistion   7/2/2014 12:41:19 AM
NO RATINGS
I had thought Crossbar utilized transistor-less "crossbar" arrays. Adding the transistor only worsens the density, compared to without.

resistion
User Rank
Author
HSR too close to cliff
resistion   7/2/2014 12:31:02 AM
NO RATINGS
That HSR definition looks too close to the cliff!



Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
IoT Network Shoot Out
July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday

Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.

Brought to you by

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.